This book examines three issues: the principle of ought implies can (OIC); the principle of alternate possibilities (PAP); and Kant's views on the duty to promote one's own happiness. It argues that although Kant was wrong to deny such a duty, the part of his denial that rests on a conception of duty incorporating both OIC and PAP is sound.
This book examines three issues: the principle of ought implies can (OIC); the principle of alternate possibilities (PAP); and Kant's views on the duty to promote one's own happiness. It argues that although Kant was wrong to deny such a duty, the part of his denial that rests on a conception of duty incorporating both OIC and PAP is sound.
Introduction Part One. Ought implies can in Kantian ethics Chapter 1. Terminology and Exegesis Section 1. Terminology Section 2. Exegesis Chapter 2. Arguments in Favor of OIC Section 1. Kant s argument for OIC Section 2. The argument from explanation Section 3. The fairness argument Section 4. The prescriptivist argument Section 5. The argument from deontic logic Chapter 3. Objections to OIC Section 1. The appeal to alternate traditions Section 2. The epistemic argument Section 3. The ordinary language objection Section 4. The appeal to culpable inability Section 5. The argument from past obligations Section 6. The argument from simplicity Section 7. The argument from excuses Section 8. The appeal to Hume s principle Section 9. The argument from reasons Section 10. The moral satisfaction objection Section 11. The appeal to obligations from nowhere Section 12. The argument from interdependence Section 13. The argument from epistemic oughts Section 14. The argument from feeling oughts Section 15. The appeal to conflicts of duties Section 16. The argument from emphasis Section 17. The appeal to conversational implicature Section 18. The exphi objection Part Two. The principle of alternate possibilities Chapter 4. Setting the stage Section 1. Frankfurt s seminal attack Section 2. Conceding PAP but mitigating the consequences Chapter 5. The connection between PAP and OIC Section 1. OIC entails PAP with respect to blame Section 2. Blame requires impermissibility Section 3. Able not to and able to do otherwise Section 4. Some concluding remarks Chapter 6. The second line of defense Section 1. The metaphysical premise Subsection 1. Flickers and alchemy Subsection 2. The dilemma defense Subsection 3. The deterministic horn Subsection 4. The new dispositionalists Subsection 5. Morally relevant alternatives Section 2. The moral premise Subsection 1. PAP and OIC Subsection 2. The W-defense Subsection 3. Counterfactual interveners and knowledge Subsection 4. The reliability of intuitions Part Three. The duty to promote one s own happiness in Kantian ethics Chapter 7. Happiness, general duties and the standard account Section 1. Happiness Section 2. General duties Section 3. The standard account Chapter 8. The means to happiness, indirect duties and two arguments for a direct duty Section 1. Indirect duties Section 2. Two arguments for a direct duty Chapter 9. Objections Section 1. Internal incoherence Section 2. The universal desire for happiness Section 3. Happiness as a necessary end Section 4. A duty to promote one s own happiness would be otiose Section 5. Happiness is impossible Notes Bibliography
Introduction Part One. Ought implies can in Kantian ethics Chapter 1. Terminology and Exegesis Section 1. Terminology Section 2. Exegesis Chapter 2. Arguments in Favor of OIC Section 1. Kant s argument for OIC Section 2. The argument from explanation Section 3. The fairness argument Section 4. The prescriptivist argument Section 5. The argument from deontic logic Chapter 3. Objections to OIC Section 1. The appeal to alternate traditions Section 2. The epistemic argument Section 3. The ordinary language objection Section 4. The appeal to culpable inability Section 5. The argument from past obligations Section 6. The argument from simplicity Section 7. The argument from excuses Section 8. The appeal to Hume s principle Section 9. The argument from reasons Section 10. The moral satisfaction objection Section 11. The appeal to obligations from nowhere Section 12. The argument from interdependence Section 13. The argument from epistemic oughts Section 14. The argument from feeling oughts Section 15. The appeal to conflicts of duties Section 16. The argument from emphasis Section 17. The appeal to conversational implicature Section 18. The exphi objection Part Two. The principle of alternate possibilities Chapter 4. Setting the stage Section 1. Frankfurt s seminal attack Section 2. Conceding PAP but mitigating the consequences Chapter 5. The connection between PAP and OIC Section 1. OIC entails PAP with respect to blame Section 2. Blame requires impermissibility Section 3. Able not to and able to do otherwise Section 4. Some concluding remarks Chapter 6. The second line of defense Section 1. The metaphysical premise Subsection 1. Flickers and alchemy Subsection 2. The dilemma defense Subsection 3. The deterministic horn Subsection 4. The new dispositionalists Subsection 5. Morally relevant alternatives Section 2. The moral premise Subsection 1. PAP and OIC Subsection 2. The W-defense Subsection 3. Counterfactual interveners and knowledge Subsection 4. The reliability of intuitions Part Three. The duty to promote one s own happiness in Kantian ethics Chapter 7. Happiness, general duties and the standard account Section 1. Happiness Section 2. General duties Section 3. The standard account Chapter 8. The means to happiness, indirect duties and two arguments for a direct duty Section 1. Indirect duties Section 2. Two arguments for a direct duty Chapter 9. Objections Section 1. Internal incoherence Section 2. The universal desire for happiness Section 3. Happiness as a necessary end Section 4. A duty to promote one s own happiness would be otiose Section 5. Happiness is impossible Notes Bibliography
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
