Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Kants Regeln des Friedens]( "Kants Regeln des Friedens")
Kants Regeln des Friedens17,95 €![Menschenrechte - Zwischen Eurozentrismus und Universalität?]( "Menschenrechte - Zwischen Eurozentrismus und Universalität?")
Menschenrechte - Zwischen Eurozentrismus und Universalität?16,95 €![Peacekeeping operations. How and under which criteria can we assess whether they are successful?]( "Peacekeeping operations. How and under which criteria can we assess whether they are successful?")
Peacekeeping operations. How and under which criteria can we assess whether they are successful?17,95 €![Kant and the Liberal Democratic Peace Theory - the Cases of Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan]( "Kant and the Liberal Democratic Peace Theory - the Cases of Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan")
Kant and the Liberal Democratic Peace Theory - the Cases of Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan15,95 €![Deutsche Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 2007]( "Deutsche Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 2007")
Deutsche Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 200717,95 €![J.J. Rousseau, I. Kant and the Theories of International Relations]( "J.J. Rousseau, I. Kant and the Theories of International Relations")
J.J. Rousseau, I. Kant and the Theories of International Relations15,95 €![Why do democratic states not fight each other? A systemic approach to the democratic peace]( "Why do democratic states not fight each other? A systemic approach to the democratic peace")
Why do democratic states not fight each other? A systemic approach to the democratic peace42,95 €
Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 1.3, University of London (Department of Politics and International Relations), language: English, abstract: War or Peace? The answer to this question is very ambiguous in classical theory; arguments laid out by both liberalists and realists are consistent although the empirical evidence so far tends to support the realist notion of perpetual conflict. Especially taking into account terrorism, intervention and intrastate conflict, a pessimistic outlook seems unavoidable. So the overwhelming empirical arguments still win the case in favour of Realism, in my opinion.To come to this argument, the first paragraph is denoted to give definitions of the most important terms and a description of the international system. After this initial clarification, the liberal position of a possible peace defended by what can be called the 'interconnectedness' thesis in political, economic and institutional terms will be presented. This will then be confronted with the realist argumentation for a never-ending state of war. The last part of the paper will deal with intrastate wars, humanitarian intervention and terrorism as the 'new threat to eternal peace' leading to a pessimistic conclusion.