Simon Foley
Intellectual Disability and the Right to a Sexual Life
A Continuation of the Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
Simon Foley
Intellectual Disability and the Right to a Sexual Life
A Continuation of the Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This book examines the autonomy/paternalism debate regarding the sexuality of adults with intellectual disability living in the parental home.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Manifestos for the Future of Critical Disability Studies57,99 €
- Vinaya ManchaiahDisability and Social Representations Theory57,99 €
- Disability, Gender and Violence over the Life Course57,99 €
- International Perspectives on Teaching with Disability59,99 €
- Oliver Mutanga (Norway University of Oslo)Students with Disabilities and the Transition to Work57,99 €
- Susan HoneymanChild Pain, Migraine, and Invisible Disability59,99 €
- Ryan ThorneycroftReimagining Disablist and Ableist Violence as Abjection57,99 €
-
-
-
This book examines the autonomy/paternalism debate regarding the sexuality of adults with intellectual disability living in the parental home.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 192
- Erscheinungstermin: 11. September 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 231mm x 155mm x 13mm
- Gewicht: 640g
- ISBN-13: 9780367430955
- ISBN-10: 0367430959
- Artikelnr.: 57781238
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 192
- Erscheinungstermin: 11. September 2019
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 231mm x 155mm x 13mm
- Gewicht: 640g
- ISBN-13: 9780367430955
- ISBN-10: 0367430959
- Artikelnr.: 57781238
Dr Simon Foley of QUB Belfast has taught Sociology in various universities throughout the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland over the past 10 years. He has published widely on issues of sexuality, social theory and social change and is an acknowledged international expert on the sociology of disability.
Introduction
Chapter 1. The who
the what and the why
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. The contested politics of researching disability
1.3. My Conceptual Framework
1.4. Ideological affiliations
Chapter 2. The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.1. Introduction
2.2 The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.3 Historical and Cultural Discourses of Sexuality
2.4 The focus on genital sex explained
2.5 The dangerous discourse of sexual expression
2.6 Liberal society and changing sexual mores
2.7 The parental perspective
2.8 Facilitated sex
2.9 Conceptualising disability
2.10 My conceptual framework
Chapter 3. Research Findings and Analysis: The Parental Perspective
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Theme 1: Parental perception of what it means to be normal - the rationale behind the paternalistic regime of care
3.3 Theme 2: Parental refutation of the charge that their regime of care is to 'blame' for the celibate lives led by some of the adult children with Down syndrome
3.4 Theme 3: Parental view of their adult sons and daughters with Down syndrome as sexual beings - and the desire that they find a girlfriend/boyfriend
3.5 Theme 4: The privileging of 'loving' boyfriend/girlfriend relationships over sexual expression for its own sake: the gender bias in action
3.6 Interviews with Adults with Down Syndrome
3.7 Theme 1: The desire to move out of the parental home
3.8 Theme 2: The desire to have more control over how their leisure time is spent
3.9 Theme 3: The role played by the mother as reluctant jailor
3.10 Theme 4: The desire to have a boyfriend/girlfriend
3.11 Theme 5: What one does in a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship?
3.12 Theme 6: The desire to be normal - the abject in action
3.13 Analysis of the Findings
Chapter 4. Third Rail Sexual Politics under Scrutiny: The Question of Faciliated Sex
4.1 Focus group findings
4.2 Focus group analysis
Chapter 5. A modest proposal regarding the normalisation of facilitated sex
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Ideological Critiques in form and content
5.3 The Three Faces of Power Debate
5.4 Conclusion
Chapter 6. Conclusions
References
Chapter 1. The who
the what and the why
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. The contested politics of researching disability
1.3. My Conceptual Framework
1.4. Ideological affiliations
Chapter 2. The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.1. Introduction
2.2 The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.3 Historical and Cultural Discourses of Sexuality
2.4 The focus on genital sex explained
2.5 The dangerous discourse of sexual expression
2.6 Liberal society and changing sexual mores
2.7 The parental perspective
2.8 Facilitated sex
2.9 Conceptualising disability
2.10 My conceptual framework
Chapter 3. Research Findings and Analysis: The Parental Perspective
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Theme 1: Parental perception of what it means to be normal - the rationale behind the paternalistic regime of care
3.3 Theme 2: Parental refutation of the charge that their regime of care is to 'blame' for the celibate lives led by some of the adult children with Down syndrome
3.4 Theme 3: Parental view of their adult sons and daughters with Down syndrome as sexual beings - and the desire that they find a girlfriend/boyfriend
3.5 Theme 4: The privileging of 'loving' boyfriend/girlfriend relationships over sexual expression for its own sake: the gender bias in action
3.6 Interviews with Adults with Down Syndrome
3.7 Theme 1: The desire to move out of the parental home
3.8 Theme 2: The desire to have more control over how their leisure time is spent
3.9 Theme 3: The role played by the mother as reluctant jailor
3.10 Theme 4: The desire to have a boyfriend/girlfriend
3.11 Theme 5: What one does in a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship?
3.12 Theme 6: The desire to be normal - the abject in action
3.13 Analysis of the Findings
Chapter 4. Third Rail Sexual Politics under Scrutiny: The Question of Faciliated Sex
4.1 Focus group findings
4.2 Focus group analysis
Chapter 5. A modest proposal regarding the normalisation of facilitated sex
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Ideological Critiques in form and content
5.3 The Three Faces of Power Debate
5.4 Conclusion
Chapter 6. Conclusions
References
Introduction
Chapter 1. The who
the what and the why
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. The contested politics of researching disability
1.3. My Conceptual Framework
1.4. Ideological affiliations
Chapter 2. The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.1. Introduction
2.2 The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.3 Historical and Cultural Discourses of Sexuality
2.4 The focus on genital sex explained
2.5 The dangerous discourse of sexual expression
2.6 Liberal society and changing sexual mores
2.7 The parental perspective
2.8 Facilitated sex
2.9 Conceptualising disability
2.10 My conceptual framework
Chapter 3. Research Findings and Analysis: The Parental Perspective
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Theme 1: Parental perception of what it means to be normal - the rationale behind the paternalistic regime of care
3.3 Theme 2: Parental refutation of the charge that their regime of care is to 'blame' for the celibate lives led by some of the adult children with Down syndrome
3.4 Theme 3: Parental view of their adult sons and daughters with Down syndrome as sexual beings - and the desire that they find a girlfriend/boyfriend
3.5 Theme 4: The privileging of 'loving' boyfriend/girlfriend relationships over sexual expression for its own sake: the gender bias in action
3.6 Interviews with Adults with Down Syndrome
3.7 Theme 1: The desire to move out of the parental home
3.8 Theme 2: The desire to have more control over how their leisure time is spent
3.9 Theme 3: The role played by the mother as reluctant jailor
3.10 Theme 4: The desire to have a boyfriend/girlfriend
3.11 Theme 5: What one does in a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship?
3.12 Theme 6: The desire to be normal - the abject in action
3.13 Analysis of the Findings
Chapter 4. Third Rail Sexual Politics under Scrutiny: The Question of Faciliated Sex
4.1 Focus group findings
4.2 Focus group analysis
Chapter 5. A modest proposal regarding the normalisation of facilitated sex
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Ideological Critiques in form and content
5.3 The Three Faces of Power Debate
5.4 Conclusion
Chapter 6. Conclusions
References
Chapter 1. The who
the what and the why
1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. The contested politics of researching disability
1.3. My Conceptual Framework
1.4. Ideological affiliations
Chapter 2. The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.1. Introduction
2.2 The Autonomy/Paternalism Debate
2.3 Historical and Cultural Discourses of Sexuality
2.4 The focus on genital sex explained
2.5 The dangerous discourse of sexual expression
2.6 Liberal society and changing sexual mores
2.7 The parental perspective
2.8 Facilitated sex
2.9 Conceptualising disability
2.10 My conceptual framework
Chapter 3. Research Findings and Analysis: The Parental Perspective
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Theme 1: Parental perception of what it means to be normal - the rationale behind the paternalistic regime of care
3.3 Theme 2: Parental refutation of the charge that their regime of care is to 'blame' for the celibate lives led by some of the adult children with Down syndrome
3.4 Theme 3: Parental view of their adult sons and daughters with Down syndrome as sexual beings - and the desire that they find a girlfriend/boyfriend
3.5 Theme 4: The privileging of 'loving' boyfriend/girlfriend relationships over sexual expression for its own sake: the gender bias in action
3.6 Interviews with Adults with Down Syndrome
3.7 Theme 1: The desire to move out of the parental home
3.8 Theme 2: The desire to have more control over how their leisure time is spent
3.9 Theme 3: The role played by the mother as reluctant jailor
3.10 Theme 4: The desire to have a boyfriend/girlfriend
3.11 Theme 5: What one does in a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship?
3.12 Theme 6: The desire to be normal - the abject in action
3.13 Analysis of the Findings
Chapter 4. Third Rail Sexual Politics under Scrutiny: The Question of Faciliated Sex
4.1 Focus group findings
4.2 Focus group analysis
Chapter 5. A modest proposal regarding the normalisation of facilitated sex
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Ideological Critiques in form and content
5.3 The Three Faces of Power Debate
5.4 Conclusion
Chapter 6. Conclusions
References