Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Improving Interagency Planning and Execution at the Operational Level: Creating a Stability and Reconstruction Component Within a Joint Task Force]( "Improving Interagency Planning and Execution at the Operational Level: Creating a Stability and Reconstruction Component Within a Joint Task Force")
Improving Interagency Planning and Execution at the Operational Level: Creating a Stability and Reconstruction Component Within a Joint Task Force59,99 €![Cleared to Engage: Improving Joint Close Air Support Effectiveness]( "Cleared to Engage: Improving Joint Close Air Support Effectiveness")
Cleared to Engage: Improving Joint Close Air Support Effectiveness59,99 €![Reachback Operations for Air Campaign Planning and Execution]( "Reachback Operations for Air Campaign Planning and Execution")
Reachback Operations for Air Campaign Planning and Execution59,99 €![A US Army Formal Fac: A Program Is the Solution for Improving Joint Fires Integration for the Maneuver Commander]( "A US Army Formal Fac: A Program Is the Solution for Improving Joint Fires Integration for the Maneuver Commander")
A US Army Formal Fac: A Program Is the Solution for Improving Joint Fires Integration for the Maneuver Commander59,99 €![Influence of Japanese Public Opinion and Government Policy on the Planning and Execution of U.S. - Japanese Bilateral Ground Exercises]( "Influence of Japanese Public Opinion and Government Policy on the Planning and Execution of U.S. - Japanese Bilateral Ground Exercises")
Influence of Japanese Public Opinion and Government Policy on the Planning and Execution of U.S. - Japanese Bilateral Ground Exercises59,99 €![Improving Navy and Air Force Tactical Air Forces Integration]( "Improving Navy and Air Force Tactical Air Forces Integration")
Improving Navy and Air Force Tactical Air Forces Integration59,99 €![Improving Reception, Staging, onward Movement, and Integration Operations for the Interim and Objective Forces]( "Improving Reception, Staging, onward Movement, and Integration Operations for the Interim and Objective Forces")
Improving Reception, Staging, onward Movement, and Integration Operations for the Interim and Objective Forces59,99 €
This study examines the current level of detailed integration in close air support (CAS) planning, with the focus on air component support of Army conventional forces, to determine if changes should be made to the current concept of operations for CAS. The results are based on interviews with numerous experienced CAS aviators with experience in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Analyses of these interviews and current doctrine were compared with the CAS Concept of Operations (CONOPS) from recent combat operations in Iraq to determine needed changes. Results demonstrate that a theater CAS CONOPS should include assigning forward air controller (airborne) (FAC(A) missions to ground maneuver units early enough for liaison with the unit; that CAS planners should create a communications architecture to facilitate direct liaison between FAC(A) wings and supported ground units; and that assignment and distribution of FAC(A) missions could be decentralized to the wing level. All of these changes are in accordance with current joint and Air Force doctrine and would improve detailed integration in joint CAS.