Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The Mosaic Account of Creation - The Miracle of To-day]( "The Mosaic Account of Creation - The Miracle of To-day")
The Mosaic Account of Creation - The Miracle of To-day25,90 €![Priestly Formation In the Shade of the Council of Trent]( "Priestly Formation In the Shade of the Council of Trent")
Priestly Formation In the Shade of the Council of Trent32,99 €![Visions of Creation in the Late Modern Age]( "Visions of Creation in the Late Modern Age")
Visions of Creation in the Late Modern Age32,99 €![Issue of the Created Qur'an]( "Issue of the Created Qur'an")
Issue of the Created Qur'an36,99 €![Are Religious-Humans Special Enough To Engage In Transhumanism]( "Are Religious-Humans Special Enough To Engage In Transhumanism")
Are Religious-Humans Special Enough To Engage In Transhumanism22,99 €![Christianity as old as the creation]( "Christianity as old as the creation")
Christianity as old as the creation26,90 €![The Scripture Doctrine of Creation]( "The Scripture Doctrine of Creation")
The Scripture Doctrine of Creation22,90 €
This study attempts to offer an ecological interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2:4a in view of the question as to what extent this passage bears footprints of anthropocentrism, on the one hand, and/or ecological wisdom, on the other hand. Extant ecological readings of this text tend to either recover its ecofriendliness, or they criticise the text on the basis of its dominion and subdual language in Genesis 1:26-28 which seems to go against the grain of ecological sensibilities. In resonance with revisionist readings, this study shows that the only way to mollify the dominion language of Genesis 1:26-28 is to read this section as part of the whole Priestly creation account. Elements of the exilic context and many literary features of Genesis 1:1-2:4a present humans as a member of a world of interdependences. Hence, accusing Genesis 1:1-2:4a of lying at the root of modern indifference towards nature, is not the whole story.