Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The United States' National Interests in Central Asia]( "The United States' National Interests in Central Asia")
The United States' National Interests in Central Asia59,99 €![U.S. Interests In Central Asia And The Challenges To Them]( "U.S. Interests In Central Asia And The Challenges To Them")
U.S. Interests In Central Asia And The Challenges To Them16,99 €![The Eritrean and Ethiopian Conflict and the Impact on United States National Security Interests in the Horn of Africa]( "The Eritrean and Ethiopian Conflict and the Impact on United States National Security Interests in the Horn of Africa")
The Eritrean and Ethiopian Conflict and the Impact on United States National Security Interests in the Horn of Africa59,99 €![Gang Violence and its Threat to Domestic and US National Security Interests]( "Gang Violence and its Threat to Domestic and US National Security Interests")
Gang Violence and its Threat to Domestic and US National Security Interests59,99 €![Vital Support: Aid to Israel and US National Security Interests]( "Vital Support: Aid to Israel and US National Security Interests")
Vital Support: Aid to Israel and US National Security Interests59,99 €![Nuclear Iran: Israeli Options for Dealing with a Nuclear-Capable Iran and Implications to United States Security Interests in the Mi]( "Nuclear Iran: Israeli Options for Dealing with a Nuclear-Capable Iran and Implications to United States Security Interests in the Mi")
Nuclear Iran: Israeli Options for Dealing with a Nuclear-Capable Iran and Implications to United States Security Interests in the Mi59,99 €![Effects of The Galileo Constellation on U.S. National Interests]( "Effects of The Galileo Constellation on U.S. National Interests")
Effects of The Galileo Constellation on U.S. National Interests59,99 €
Threats to security within the Asia-Pacific region continue to evolve. Traditional and non-traditional threats to state sovereignty and individuals exist across the region. Despite most recent security challenges being transnational, the dominant security policy within the Asia-Pacific region remains state-centric. This policy approach potentially generates instability by undervaluing the importance of individual security. The United Nations (UN) advocates human security as a means of providing freedom from want and freedom from fear for individuals. However, despite the altruistic motives of the UN, neatly separating traditional and human security is unrealistic, as sovereignty remains the foundation of the international system. Therefore, a human security policy approach must include the state-centric means available through instruments of national power. This research investigates whether application of such a human security policy approach is in Australia's national security interests. The research identifies that Australia's enduring national security objectives and interests are well defined and pursued using a state-centric policy approach. By analyzing case studies addressing threats in Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Southwest Pacific, the research concludes that a human security policy approach is in Australia's national security interests.