Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Herméneutique pour la protection des seconds occupants]( "Herméneutique pour la protection des seconds occupants")
Herméneutique pour la protection des seconds occupants26,99 €![A hermeneutical exercise on the oil phenomenon in Mexico]( "A hermeneutical exercise on the oil phenomenon in Mexico")
A hermeneutical exercise on the oil phenomenon in Mexico26,99 €![The United Nations and the Effective Protection of Minorities]( "The United Nations and the Effective Protection of Minorities")
The United Nations and the Effective Protection of Minorities23,99 €![The State's Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]( "The State's Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities")
The State's Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities36,99 €![Management and protection of the Moroccan Cultural Heritage]( "Management and protection of the Moroccan Cultural Heritage")
Management and protection of the Moroccan Cultural Heritage51,99 €![Water Power: Hearings Before the Committee On Water Power of the House of Representatives, Sixty-Fifth Congress, Second Session, Ma]( "Water Power: Hearings Before the Committee On Water Power of the House of Representatives, Sixty-Fifth Congress, Second Session, Ma")
Water Power: Hearings Before the Committee On Water Power of the House of Representatives, Sixty-Fifth Congress, Second Session, Ma43,99 €![Employers' Liability Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897, and the Employer's Liability Act, 1880]( "Employers' Liability Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897, and the Employer's Liability Act, 1880")
Employers' Liability Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1897, and the Employer's Liability Act, 188029,99 €
This book addresses the normative and factual requirements prescribed by Law 1448 of 2011, to analyze the legal figure of opposition, presented by those who intend to assert the rights subsequently acquired over the lands claimed in said process and the correlative requirement to prove a behavior adjusted to the standard of good faith exempt from guilt as a presupposition to obtain economic compensation; in contrast to a reality of deficit of protection to vulnerable and legitimate secondary occupants, who have not surpassed said parameter set forth by the law, for whom the judgment constitutes an unacceptable injury to constitutional mandates that protect them. Faced with this reality, initially not foreseen by the Law, it has been the jurisprudence of the highest Constitutional Court that, in consideration of the rights of those affected by the restitution order, has raised guiding criteria of judicial hermeneutics, which, together with the argumentative method proposed in thisbook, will lead to justify the decision to be adopted in this regard.