Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Influence of Personality Type and Anonymity on Participation in a Group Support System]( "Influence of Personality Type and Anonymity on Participation in a Group Support System")
Influence of Personality Type and Anonymity on Participation in a Group Support System59,99 €![Use of a Marine Amphibious Force as a Field Army or Army Group Operational Reserve]( "Use of a Marine Amphibious Force as a Field Army or Army Group Operational Reserve")
Use of a Marine Amphibious Force as a Field Army or Army Group Operational Reserve59,99 €![Field Marshall von Manstein's Counteroffensive of Army Group South, February-March 1943: The Last Operational Level Victory of the Panzer Forces on th]( "Field Marshall von Manstein's Counteroffensive of Army Group South, February-March 1943: The Last Operational Level Victory of the Panzer Forces on th")
Field Marshall von Manstein's Counteroffensive of Army Group South, February-March 1943: The Last Operational Level Victory of the Panzer Forces on th59,99 €![Influence of Anonymity in a Group Problem-Solving Environment]( "Influence of Anonymity in a Group Problem-Solving Environment")
Influence of Anonymity in a Group Problem-Solving Environment59,99 €![US and China Competition for Influence in Central Asia: A Comparative Analysis]( "US and China Competition for Influence in Central Asia: A Comparative Analysis")
US and China Competition for Influence in Central Asia: A Comparative Analysis59,99 €![A Generalized Decision Support System for the Contracting Career Field]( "A Generalized Decision Support System for the Contracting Career Field")
A Generalized Decision Support System for the Contracting Career Field59,99 €![The Influence of a Tranquilizing Drug (meprobamate) on Learning of High and Low Anxiety Groups]( "The Influence of a Tranquilizing Drug (meprobamate) on Learning of High and Low Anxiety Groups")
The Influence of a Tranquilizing Drug (meprobamate) on Learning of High and Low Anxiety Groups15,99 €
This study examined the effect of Group Decision Support System (GDSS) technology on perceived influence modes. The researcher measured perceived influence modes in two group treatments: GDSS groups and non-GDSS (N-GDSS) mediated groups. Actual groups in both treatments performed judgmental tasks of their own choosing. Group members then completed a survey that measures their perceptions regarding five influence sources: expert influence, influence from legitimate authority, referent influence, reward influence, and coercive influence. The survey also measured the extent to which members perceived an "opportunity to influence" other group members. For each variable measured in both treatment groups, mean scores were calculated from respondents' ratings. Analysis indicated that GDSS technology significantly reduces the amount of influence perceived by group members when compared to members in N-GDSS groups. Results also indicated that there was no significant difference between treatment groups regarding members' perceived "opportunity to influence" other group members.