Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Guide to the Foreign Service Officer Selection Process]( "Guide to the Foreign Service Officer Selection Process")
Guide to the Foreign Service Officer Selection Process20,99 €![An Agency Theory View of the Military Advisor]( "An Agency Theory View of the Military Advisor")
An Agency Theory View of the Military Advisor60,99 €![Can the Use of In-Unit Training Improve Duty Military Occupational Specialty Qualification in the Reserve Component?]( "Can the Use of In-Unit Training Improve Duty Military Occupational Specialty Qualification in the Reserve Component?")
Can the Use of In-Unit Training Improve Duty Military Occupational Specialty Qualification in the Reserve Component?60,99 €![The American Military Advisor]( "The American Military Advisor")
The American Military Advisor19,99 €![The Diffusion of Military Technologies to Foreign Nations: Arms Transfers Can Preserve the Defense Technological and Industrial Base]( "The Diffusion of Military Technologies to Foreign Nations: Arms Transfers Can Preserve the Defense Technological and Industrial Base")
The Diffusion of Military Technologies to Foreign Nations: Arms Transfers Can Preserve the Defense Technological and Industrial Base60,99 €![Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Case Study for the United States Military in Foreign Internal Defense]( "Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Case Study for the United States Military in Foreign Internal Defense")
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Case Study for the United States Military in Foreign Internal Defense59,99 €![Concept of Common Training: A Comparison of Military Qualification Standards II with Selected Past Officer Basic Course Programs of Instruction]( "Concept of Common Training: A Comparison of Military Qualification Standards II with Selected Past Officer Basic Course Programs of Instruction")
Concept of Common Training: A Comparison of Military Qualification Standards II with Selected Past Officer Basic Course Programs of Instruction59,99 €
Will centralized screening and selection improve foreign military advisor performance on the battlefield? The Army's 2009 doctrine on security force assistance indicates selection is necessary to find suitable Soldiers for the mission. The factors affecting advisor team performance include the complex mission and environment, team leadership, team development training, and Soldier attributes. Recent advisors indicate the lack of appropriate leadership skills and personal attributes of advisor team members are the primary factors affecting cohesion on teams. Special Forces (SF) assumed principal responsibility for the foreign internal defense mission post-Vietnam, but the global war on terrorism and competing SF mission requirements created demands once again for advisor conventional force manning. SF recruiting units screen all candidates to ensure they meet a high benchmark for foreign military advising; however, the Army as a whole has not employed this same procedure for conventional force Soldiers. A more deliberate and rigorous screening and selection process for conventional force military advisors will improve advisor team leadership, cohesion and combat performance. The Army should maintain the current advisory team construct, but the SF model for centrally screening, selecting and qualifying foreign military advisors should be incorporated, with modifications. Human Resources Command (HRC) should retain current responsibility for manning teams, but with specific changes to the selection, assignment process and policy.