Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Explaining the Meaning of Words: A Descriptive Study on Strategies]( "Explaining the Meaning of Words: A Descriptive Study on Strategies")
Explaining the Meaning of Words: A Descriptive Study on Strategies17,95 €![Theories for Explaining Linguistic Behaviour in Gender Interaction]( "Theories for Explaining Linguistic Behaviour in Gender Interaction")
Theories for Explaining Linguistic Behaviour in Gender Interaction15,95 €![The diachronic development of 'ought (to)' and 'should' as an example of Grammaticalization]( "The diachronic development of 'ought (to)' and 'should' as an example of Grammaticalization")
The diachronic development of 'ought (to)' and 'should' as an example of Grammaticalization17,95 €![The English future markers]( "The English future markers")
The English future markers15,95 €![Competing Motivations in the Process of Language Change]( "Competing Motivations in the Process of Language Change")
Competing Motivations in the Process of Language Change15,95 €![The relative clause formation in Zulu]( "The relative clause formation in Zulu")
The relative clause formation in Zulu17,95 €![Die Entwicklung des ökonomischen Denkens und die wirtschaftspolitische Praxis in Großbritannien. Smith, Keynes, Thatcher und Blair]( "Die Entwicklung des ökonomischen Denkens und die wirtschaftspolitische Praxis in Großbritannien. Smith, Keynes, Thatcher und Blair")
Die Entwicklung des ökonomischen Denkens und die wirtschaftspolitische Praxis in Großbritannien. Smith, Keynes, Thatcher und Blair47,95 €
Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,0, University of Wuppertal (Anglistik/Amerikanistik), course: Sprachwissenschaft, language: English, abstract: The paper deals with the unidirectionality of grammaticalization, which is explained by Haspelmath within a usage-based theory of language change as proposed by Keller, who sees language change as an invisible-hand process. Haspelmath focuses on the maxim of extravagance as the main factor for irreversibility. The notion of extravagance was criticised by Geurts as being inappropriate and unnecessary for explaining the unidirectionality of grammaticalization. Haspelmath's explanation is extended by Huelva Unternbäumen, who derives the irreversibility of grammaticalization from three conditions that have to be fulfilled grammaticalization and degrammaticalization to take place.