Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![An Interactive Decision Support System for Scheduling Fighter Pilot Training]( "An Interactive Decision Support System for Scheduling Fighter Pilot Training")
An Interactive Decision Support System for Scheduling Fighter Pilot Training59,99 €![Evaluation of Barnes' Method and Kriging for Estimating the Low Level Wind Field]( "Evaluation of Barnes' Method and Kriging for Estimating the Low Level Wind Field")
Evaluation of Barnes' Method and Kriging for Estimating the Low Level Wind Field60,99 €![A Decision Support System for Effective Scheduling in an F-16 Pilot Training Squadron]( "A Decision Support System for Effective Scheduling in an F-16 Pilot Training Squadron")
A Decision Support System for Effective Scheduling in an F-16 Pilot Training Squadron59,99 €![Education 4.0 Knowledge. Peter Chew Method For Solution Of Triangle]( "Education 4.0 Knowledge. Peter Chew Method For Solution Of Triangle")
Education 4.0 Knowledge. Peter Chew Method For Solution Of Triangle14,99 €![A Group Theoretic Tabu Search Methodology for Solving the Theater Distribution Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problem]( "A Group Theoretic Tabu Search Methodology for Solving the Theater Distribution Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problem")
A Group Theoretic Tabu Search Methodology for Solving the Theater Distribution Vehicle Routing and Scheduling Problem60,99 €![Nanotechnology Applications for ISR: The Solution to the Intelligence Gap?]( "Nanotechnology Applications for ISR: The Solution to the Intelligence Gap?")
Nanotechnology Applications for ISR: The Solution to the Intelligence Gap?59,99 €![A US Army Formal Fac: A Program Is the Solution for Improving Joint Fires Integration for the Maneuver Commander]( "A US Army Formal Fac: A Program Is the Solution for Improving Joint Fires Integration for the Maneuver Commander")
A US Army Formal Fac: A Program Is the Solution for Improving Joint Fires Integration for the Maneuver Commander60,99 €
THE GOAL SYSTEM version 2.2 is the latest in a lineage that includes Optimized Production Technology (OPT) and DISASTER. Earlier work with DISASTER revealed potential shortcomings with sequential schedule-building algorithms when multiple interactive constraints exist. Since THE GOAL SYSTEM version 2.2 has a capacity for simultaneous schedule-building, this study evaluated differences between the two algorithms. Using benchmark scheduling problems developed during the earlier evaluation of DISASTER, a set of THE GOAL SYSTEM solutions was created and compared quantitatively to both DISASTER solutions and solutions which optimally minimize maximum tardiness. A broad set of performance measurement criteria were also used to obtain a more comprehensive evaluation of the solutions. Performance of THE GOAL SYSTEM was quite good with respect to maximum tardiness. Performance with respect to average flowtime, percentage of tardy jobs, and total days late for a set of job orders was markedly poorer than the DISASTER solutions. The results were unexpected, since the simultaneous scheduling algorithm is less restricted in its options for schedule creation. The author concluded that the simultaneous feature of THE GOAL SYSTEM was better suited for conflict resolution during an iterative process than as a stand-alone scheduling algorithm.