A comparative analysis of four European Commission advisory forums comprising organized civil society actors, which investigates the conflict between the capacity of European Commission committee governance to improve system effectiveness, provide efficiency gains and sustain adequate democratic credentials.
A comparative analysis of four European Commission advisory forums comprising organized civil society actors, which investigates the conflict between the capacity of European Commission committee governance to improve system effectiveness, provide efficiency gains and sustain adequate democratic credentials.
Karen Heard-Laureote is a Lecturer in European Politics and Public Policy at the School of Social, Historical and Literary Studies at Portsmouth University, UK
Inhaltsangabe
Acknowledgements. Abbreviations and Acronyms. Introduction. 1. Legitimacy and Effectiveness - Two Principal Standards of Good Governance 2. Assessing (Input/Output) Legitimacy 3. The EU Eco-Labelling Board Consultation Forum 4. The European Health Policy Forum 5. The Trade Contact Group and Civil Society Dialogue 6. The Agricultural Advisory Groups. Conclusion: Trapped between Legitimacy Claims - Managing Expectations for ECAFs. Bibliography
Acknowledgements. Abbreviations and Acronyms. Introduction. 1. Legitimacy and Effectiveness - Two Principal Standards of Good Governance 2. Assessing (Input/Output) Legitimacy 3. The EU Eco-Labelling Board Consultation Forum 4. The European Health Policy Forum 5. The Trade Contact Group and Civil Society Dialogue 6. The Agricultural Advisory Groups. Conclusion: Trapped between Legitimacy Claims - Managing Expectations for ECAFs. Bibliography
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309