Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Land use Change Evaluation in a Humid Subtropical Watershed]( "Land use Change Evaluation in a Humid Subtropical Watershed")
Land use Change Evaluation in a Humid Subtropical Watershed40,99 €![Land use and land cover change analysis]( "Land use and land cover change analysis")
Land use and land cover change analysis32,99 €![Farm drainage The Principles, Processes, and Effects of Draining Land with Stones, Wood, Plows, and Open Ditches, and Especially with Tiles]( "Farm drainage The Principles, Processes, and Effects of Draining Land with Stones, Wood, Plows, and Open Ditches, and Especially with Tiles")
Farm drainage The Principles, Processes, and Effects of Draining Land with Stones, Wood, Plows, and Open Ditches, and Especially with Tiles19,90 €![Breakdown of Land]( "Breakdown of Land")
Breakdown of Land36,99 €![Building Harmonized Private and State Land Data and Information System]( "Building Harmonized Private and State Land Data and Information System")
Building Harmonized Private and State Land Data and Information System26,99 €![Wireless Communication System for Land Seismic Operations]( "Wireless Communication System for Land Seismic Operations")
Wireless Communication System for Land Seismic Operations32,99 €![The deep waters of land reforms]( "The deep waters of land reforms")
The deep waters of land reforms38,99 €
Land cover change analysis has shown that the cultivated land has increased from 28% to 31.21%, settlement area from 16.26% to 22.35% between 1973 and 2000, while forest area has decreased from 16.78% to 9.48% and bushes and shrub land from 36% to 34.96%. Sensitivity analysis result shown that both Curve Number (CN) and Alpha factor are the most sensitive parameters affecting the hydrology of the watershed. The model was calibrated from 1993-1998 and validated from 1999-2001. The performance of the model was evaluated on the basis of performance rating criteria, coefficient of determination (R2), Nash and Sutcliff efficiency (NSE), and percent difference. The R2 and NSE values for the watershed were 0.87 and 0.79 for calibration, 0.89 and 0.81 for validation respectively. The evaluation of the model indicated that the mean annual surface flow for 2000 land cover was increased by 46% than 1973 land cover. Similarly the 1986 land cover mean annual surface flow was higher by 20% than 1973 land cover. Generally, the analysis indicated that the mean wet monthly flow for 2000 land cover was increased by 9.43% than 1973 land cover.