Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Dompter le dragon nucléaire ?]( "Dompter le dragon nucléaire ?")
Dompter le dragon nucléaire ?32,65 €![Stagnation and Drift in the Western Balkans]( "Stagnation and Drift in the Western Balkans")
Stagnation and Drift in the Western Balkans114,05 €![Eastern Luminaries Disclosed to Western Eyes]( "Eastern Luminaries Disclosed to Western Eyes")
Eastern Luminaries Disclosed to Western Eyes94,35 €![A Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Cyclic Myths]( "A Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Cyclic Myths")
A Comparative Study of Chinese and Western Cyclic Myths53,95 €![The Cultural Identities of European Cities]( "The Cultural Identities of European Cities")
The Cultural Identities of European Cities73,25 €![Developing International Business in the Context of Culture and Ethics in Transformation]( "Developing International Business in the Context of Culture and Ethics in Transformation")
Developing International Business in the Context of Culture and Ethics in Transformation81,70 €![The Politics of Passion]( "The Politics of Passion")
The Politics of Passion57,75 €
The Western reinvention of China can be found in various discourses ranging from French Enlightenment philosophes , German political economists, to British writers through centuries. It covers all aspects of Chinese culture, and varies from zealous idealization to blatant demonization.
But do those divergent and even contradictory accounts offer an alternative to "Orientalism?" Or are they artifacts with inherent and even dangerous limitations? More fundamentally, does the cultural theory of Orientalism provide an adequate basis for cross-cultural studies? This study examines conflicting 18 th - and 19 th -century European presentations of China and the inherent consistency in them. It also critiques contending positions on major cultural theories and contributes distinct and dynamic perspectives in the field of cross-cultural studies.
But do those divergent and even contradictory accounts offer an alternative to "Orientalism?" Or are they artifacts with inherent and even dangerous limitations? More fundamentally, does the cultural theory of Orientalism provide an adequate basis for cross-cultural studies? This study examines conflicting 18 th - and 19 th -century European presentations of China and the inherent consistency in them. It also critiques contending positions on major cultural theories and contributes distinct and dynamic perspectives in the field of cross-cultural studies.