21,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandfertig in 1-2 Wochen
11 °P sammeln
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Asian and Jungian Views of Ethics]( "Asian and Jungian Views of Ethics")
Asian and Jungian Views of Ethics74,99 €![Fighting For Her Life]( "Fighting For Her Life")
Fighting For Her Life22,99 €![The Psychology of Trust]( "The Psychology of Trust")
The Psychology of Trust129,00 €![Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication (Hc)]( "Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication (Hc)")
Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication (Hc)97,99 €![Conquer Your Jealousy]( "Conquer Your Jealousy")
Conquer Your Jealousy9,99 €![Biological Experimentation, its Function and Limits, Including Answers to Nine Questions Submitted From the Leigh-Browne Trust]( "Biological Experimentation, its Function and Limits, Including Answers to Nine Questions Submitted From the Leigh-Browne Trust")
Biological Experimentation, its Function and Limits, Including Answers to Nine Questions Submitted From the Leigh-Browne Trust33,99 €![Trust within Learning]( "Trust within Learning")
Trust within Learning94,99 €
Intimate relationships are seen as one of the foundations of basic human needs, necessary to form and maintain long-lasting bonds. Despite this emphasis on intimacy in everyday life, the experience of the disabled population does not inherently share similar expectations and practicalities of intimacy compared to nondisabled people. Previous research suggests that disabled individuals are more likely to remain single despite their reported desire for intimate, romantic relations. The current study seeks to understand this discrepancy between desire and outcome of romantic relationships by analyzing views and opinions on relationships and intimacy through looking into expectations, barriers, and supports for long-term intimate relationship formation between two separate, yet related perspectives