Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Unconstitutional Solitude]( "Unconstitutional Solitude")
Unconstitutional Solitude81,99 €![The Private Sector and Criminal Justice]( "The Private Sector and Criminal Justice")
The Private Sector and Criminal Justice110,99 €![Universal Jurisdiction: The Sierra Leone Profile]( "Universal Jurisdiction: The Sierra Leone Profile")
Universal Jurisdiction: The Sierra Leone Profile37,99 €![Alsberg, Der Beweisantrag im Strafprozess]( "Alsberg, Der Beweisantrag im Strafprozess")
Alsberg, Der Beweisantrag im Strafprozess139,00 €![A Brief History of International Criminal Law and International Criminal Court]( "A Brief History of International Criminal Law and International Criminal Court")
A Brief History of International Criminal Law and International Criminal Court81,99 €![Fragestellung, Abstimmungsverfahren und Abstimmungsgeheimnis im Strafverfahren.]( "Fragestellung, Abstimmungsverfahren und Abstimmungsgeheimnis im Strafverfahren.")
Fragestellung, Abstimmungsverfahren und Abstimmungsgeheimnis im Strafverfahren.54,90 €![Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Volume 19, 2016]( "Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Volume 19, 2016")
Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Volume 19, 2016103,99 €
This book offers a comparative exploration of how journalists across different newsrooms around the world access and interpret statistics when producing stories related to crime. Looking at the nature of news sources regularly used by journalists, Lugo-Ocando analyses how these numbers are used to report crime.
As the author argues, far from being straightforward, the relationship between numbers and journalists in the context of crime reporting is complex, and at times, problematic. Because the reporting of crime statistics impacts upon policymaking, we need to better understand how these statistics are used and reported in order to improve the process of decision.
Finally, Lugo-Ocando maintains that the only way to create a fairer justice system and a better-informed general public is by improving the way crime is covered in the news. A compelling and informed text, this book will be of interest to scholars and students of criminology and journalism alike.
As the author argues, far from being straightforward, the relationship between numbers and journalists in the context of crime reporting is complex, and at times, problematic. Because the reporting of crime statistics impacts upon policymaking, we need to better understand how these statistics are used and reported in order to improve the process of decision.
Finally, Lugo-Ocando maintains that the only way to create a fairer justice system and a better-informed general public is by improving the way crime is covered in the news. A compelling and informed text, this book will be of interest to scholars and students of criminology and journalism alike.