Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Gender and the Growth of the Export Horticulture Industry in Kenya]( "Gender and the Growth of the Export Horticulture Industry in Kenya")
Gender and the Growth of the Export Horticulture Industry in Kenya26,99 €![Pineapple Production and Household Poverty Alleviation Indicators]( "Pineapple Production and Household Poverty Alleviation Indicators")
Pineapple Production and Household Poverty Alleviation Indicators42,99 €![Gender Disparity in Agricultural Extension Services Delivery]( "Gender Disparity in Agricultural Extension Services Delivery")
Gender Disparity in Agricultural Extension Services Delivery46,99 €![Gender Analysis in Agriculture]( "Gender Analysis in Agriculture")
Gender Analysis in Agriculture38,99 €![Gender perspective of IFS in hilly and plain region of Tripura]( "Gender perspective of IFS in hilly and plain region of Tripura")
Gender perspective of IFS in hilly and plain region of Tripura36,99 €![Effects of Gender Dynamics on Fish Farming]( "Effects of Gender Dynamics on Fish Farming")
Effects of Gender Dynamics on Fish Farming26,99 €![Willingness to adopt cassava waste utilization technologies in Nigeria]( "Willingness to adopt cassava waste utilization technologies in Nigeria")
Willingness to adopt cassava waste utilization technologies in Nigeria32,99 €
A survey was conducted in Khanchikot VDC of Arghakhanchi district during May, 2014 to assess the socioeconomic status and gender analysis of seed producers. For the study, 60 households were selected by using simple random sampling. Data were collected from pre-tested questionnaire by using face to face interview schedule. There were 56.67% seed producers and 43.3% non- producers and a comparative study was conducted between them. The average land holding size of seed producers was higher (20.13 ropani) than non- seed producers (12.54 ropani). Khoriya and rainfed land was more than khet and bari land. The land of male headed household is comparatively more irrigated than female headed households. Female headed households were active in farmers group (71.04 %) and male head households were active in both co-operatives and farmers group. Decision business operation, loan taking, bank account was taken by males and decision on cropping pattern, deficit labor use, religious and social works was taken by females.