Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The neology created by the coupe décalé]( "The neology created by the coupe décalé")
The neology created by the coupe décalé26,99 €![Classical Chinese]( "Classical Chinese")
Classical Chinese22,99 €![Voices From The Hills: North-East Indian English Poetry]( "Voices From The Hills: North-East Indian English Poetry")
Voices From The Hills: North-East Indian English Poetry38,99 €![The Poetry of Du Fu]( "The Poetry of Du Fu")
The Poetry of Du Fu223,99 €![New Perspectives on Contemporary Chinese Poetry]( "New Perspectives on Contemporary Chinese Poetry")
New Perspectives on Contemporary Chinese Poetry37,99 €![Classical Latin]( "Classical Latin")
Classical Latin22,99 €![Text Linguistics and Classical Studies]( "Text Linguistics and Classical Studies")
Text Linguistics and Classical Studies63,99 €
Produced by two literary cultures Chinese and English the genre of classical Chinese poetry re-created as English poetry is subjected to critical scrutiny in both its original and re-created forms. This work explores changes in approaches to the interpretation of the genre during the twentieth century translations. Comparative analysis of publications by Ezra Pound and Arthur Waley; Burton Watson and Gary Snyder; James J. Y. Liu and Stephen Owen and Pauline Yu and Haun Saussy provides insight into what factors influenced their approaches to interpretation of the genre. Primary influences family, education and personal pursuits did affect interpreters of the genre but secondary influences critical theories, literary trends, political, religious and social movements had greater impact. Isogesis, an unavoidable factor of transcultural texts, insidiously influences how the genre is interpreted but late in the twentieth century, the use of montage and anthology reduced theeffect of isogesis by returning the genre to its cultural roots, the Shijing. In the third millennium, multiple approaches employed as poetic montage can reduce isogesis in the genre.