Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![The U.S. Air Force Just Another Interest Group? An Examination of Post-Cold War Civil-Military Relations]( "The U.S. Air Force Just Another Interest Group? An Examination of Post-Cold War Civil-Military Relations")
The U.S. Air Force Just Another Interest Group? An Examination of Post-Cold War Civil-Military Relations59,99 €![INSS China Strategic Perspectives 2: Civil-Military Relations in China: Assessing the PLA's Role in Elite Politics]( "INSS China Strategic Perspectives 2: Civil-Military Relations in China: Assessing the PLA's Role in Elite Politics")
INSS China Strategic Perspectives 2: Civil-Military Relations in China: Assessing the PLA's Role in Elite Politics59,99 €![Reexamining the Crisis: Civil-Military Relations during the Clinton Administration]( "Reexamining the Crisis: Civil-Military Relations during the Clinton Administration")
Reexamining the Crisis: Civil-Military Relations during the Clinton Administration59,99 €![Perspective on the Military Involvement in the War on Drugs: Is There a Better Way?]( "Perspective on the Military Involvement in the War on Drugs: Is There a Better Way?")
Perspective on the Military Involvement in the War on Drugs: Is There a Better Way?59,99 €![U.S. Army School of the Americas and Its Impact on United States-Latin America Military Relations in the 1980's]( "U.S. Army School of the Americas and Its Impact on United States-Latin America Military Relations in the 1980's")
U.S. Army School of the Americas and Its Impact on United States-Latin America Military Relations in the 1980's59,99 €![Loose Words, Not Nukes: The Impact of U.S. Nuclear Force Structure Debate on NATO Perceptions of Extended Deterrence]( "Loose Words, Not Nukes: The Impact of U.S. Nuclear Force Structure Debate on NATO Perceptions of Extended Deterrence")
Loose Words, Not Nukes: The Impact of U.S. Nuclear Force Structure Debate on NATO Perceptions of Extended Deterrence59,99 €![24th Infantry Regiment and the Racial Debate in the U.S. Army]( "24th Infantry Regiment and the Racial Debate in the U.S. Army")
24th Infantry Regiment and the Racial Debate in the U.S. Army59,99 €
The question of U.S. intervention in the conflicts surrounding the breakup of the former Yugoslavia from 1991 to 1995 was one of the most contentious foreign policy problems of the time. After the failure of diplomatic initiatives, the question came down to whether or not military force should be used in an effort to end the conflict. This thesis discusses the role of the U.S. military in this debate. The paper traces the outlines of the course of U.S. policy in the region starting with the Bush administration's unsuccessful efforts in 1991 to prevent the fighting from continuing and spreading to Bosnia and continuing with the Clinton administration's similar efforts. In the Clinton administration, these failures were a result of policy maker indecision, which was greatly compounded by U.S. military leaders exercising their political influence publicly--sometimes in opposition to administration policy--in the national debate over the issue. This hamstrung the policy-making apparatus both because of the huge prestige of the military and its leaders, and because of the relative political weakness of President Clinton vis-à-vis the military. When the decision was finally made to commit military forces to implement the Dayton agreement in 1995, the leadership of the military undertook the mission on its own terms, defined its own success criteria, and vetoed any cooperation with civil implementation authorities. As a result the implementation of the agreement has been much slower than it might have been and there have been other ill effects both in Bosnia and on the U.S. military itself.