Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Does Thinking in a Foreign Language Lead to Riskier Decisions? An Empirical Study of Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas]( "Does Thinking in a Foreign Language Lead to Riskier Decisions? An Empirical Study of Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas")
Does Thinking in a Foreign Language Lead to Riskier Decisions? An Empirical Study of Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas15,95 €![Making Decisions in Compulsory Mental Health Work]( "Making Decisions in Compulsory Mental Health Work")
Making Decisions in Compulsory Mental Health Work132,99 €![The Effect of Negative Emotions in Decisions]( "The Effect of Negative Emotions in Decisions")
The Effect of Negative Emotions in Decisions17,95 €![Making Decisions That Matter]( "Making Decisions That Matter")
Making Decisions That Matter189,99 €![Consumer Knowledge and Financial Decisions]( "Consumer Knowledge and Financial Decisions")
Consumer Knowledge and Financial Decisions74,99 €![Decisions in the Brain]( "Decisions in the Brain")
Decisions in the Brain38,99 €![Die sozial-kognitive Lerntheorie Albert Banduras]( "Die sozial-kognitive Lerntheorie Albert Banduras")
Die sozial-kognitive Lerntheorie Albert Banduras15,95 €
Bachelor Thesis from the year 2016 in the subject Psychology - Diagnostics, grade: 1,0, Humboldt-University of Berlin (Institut für Psychologie), language: English, abstract: How efficacy data is presented influences information processing and treatment decisions of patients and health professionals. The present study investigated the impact of risk reduction format on the understanding and recall of treatment effects, as well as on the acceptance of the treatment in question. The effects of intelligence and prior experience were examined in an explorative way. In an online questionnaire, 172 laypersons read a hypothetical scenario of a visit to the dentist and the possibility to take paracetamol for pain relief. Participants received efficacy information either as absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction or number needed to treat, interpreted these figures and indicated the likelihood of them taking the medication. In the end, they were asked to recall the initially presented effect. Risk reduction in relative terms was understood least well and more persuasive than in absolute terms. Prior experience with the medication had an impact on its acceptance. Probably, the overestimation of relative risk information mediates its higher persuasiveness.