Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Does ASEAN matter? Reconciling realist and constructivist approaches to regional security in Southeast Asia]( "Does ASEAN matter? Reconciling realist and constructivist approaches to regional security in Southeast Asia")
Does ASEAN matter? Reconciling realist and constructivist approaches to regional security in Southeast Asia17,95 €![Managing Great Power Politics]( "Managing Great Power Politics")
Managing Great Power Politics30,99 €![Managing Great Power Politics]( "Managing Great Power Politics")
Managing Great Power Politics37,99 €![The Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Regionalism in East Asia]( "The Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Regionalism in East Asia")
The Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Regionalism in East Asia95,99 €![EU and ASEAN organisations]( "EU and ASEAN organisations")
EU and ASEAN organisations26,99 €![Reforming the Refugee Regime]( "Reforming the Refugee Regime")
Reforming the Refugee Regime15,95 €![Do nuclear weapons prevent regional wars?]( "Do nuclear weapons prevent regional wars?")
Do nuclear weapons prevent regional wars?15,95 €
Essay from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, Seattle Pacific University, language: English, abstract: China's economic success over the last several decades has unarguably attracted the attention of leaders and governments in every corner of the globe. McDougall points out that the, "...US-China economic relationship is clear. The US is China's biggest customer (18.4% of China's exports in 2009); China is the single most important source of imports for the US (19.0% of US imports in 2009)" (McDougall, 6). The ramifications of a fully modernized China that actively participates in shaping and leading the global economy are widespread, as China possesses the capital and manpower necessary to influence the course of history. Specifically, the United States has made numerous declarations that place China among the top threats to a realist version of international order that anticipates balancing of power and ultimately violent confrontationbetween rising powers and the established hegemon.I will draw upon China's long history, recent collaborations with its East Asian neighbors, and economic policies, to argue that economic mercantilism and constructivism better explain China's development than the dominant realist theoretical framework. Furthermore, I will argue that constructivism will demonstrate that China's continued development is peaceful in nature and instead of destabilizing international and regional order holds the capacity for benefitting all of the involved actors.