Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Marine Corps JROTC: Strategic Option for Long Term Force Sustainment]( "Marine Corps JROTC: Strategic Option for Long Term Force Sustainment")
Marine Corps JROTC: Strategic Option for Long Term Force Sustainment59,99 €![Prediction of Long-Term Strength of Thermoplastic Composites Using Time-Temperature Superposition]( "Prediction of Long-Term Strength of Thermoplastic Composites Using Time-Temperature Superposition")
Prediction of Long-Term Strength of Thermoplastic Composites Using Time-Temperature Superposition59,99 €![A Long-Term United States' Energy Policy Without Venezuelan Oil]( "A Long-Term United States' Energy Policy Without Venezuelan Oil")
A Long-Term United States' Energy Policy Without Venezuelan Oil59,99 €![Bush Administration's Global War on Terrorism and the Long-Term Security Goals of the United States]( "Bush Administration's Global War on Terrorism and the Long-Term Security Goals of the United States")
Bush Administration's Global War on Terrorism and the Long-Term Security Goals of the United States59,99 €![Shaping the Middle East in an Era of Revolution: Synchronizing U.S. Central Command Theater Engagement]( "Shaping the Middle East in an Era of Revolution: Synchronizing U.S. Central Command Theater Engagement")
Shaping the Middle East in an Era of Revolution: Synchronizing U.S. Central Command Theater Engagement59,99 €![From Theater Missile Defense to Antimissile Offensive Actions: A Near-Term Strategic Approach for the USAF]( "From Theater Missile Defense to Antimissile Offensive Actions: A Near-Term Strategic Approach for the USAF")
From Theater Missile Defense to Antimissile Offensive Actions: A Near-Term Strategic Approach for the USAF59,99 €![Long Term Implementation of a 100 Percent Baggage Screening System: A Value Focused Thinking Approach]( "Long Term Implementation of a 100 Percent Baggage Screening System: A Value Focused Thinking Approach")
Long Term Implementation of a 100 Percent Baggage Screening System: A Value Focused Thinking Approach59,99 €
Since man's initial contact with space in 1957, the U.S. and Russia have flirted with putting weapons in space. Today, two camps exist in the space weapons debate: sanctuary and weaponization. The sanctuary camp argues that space should remain free of weapons because it is in the best interest of the United States. The weaponization camp feels the U.S. dependence on space is too great to leave assets there unprotected. Weaponization is especially important because of the large dependence of the U.S. military on space for force enhancement purposes. This thesis examines some of the major arguments by evaluating them against the U.S. instruments of national power: diplomatic, information, military, and economic. According to this thesis' research, deploying weapons in space would disadvantage the United States in the long term. The evaluation of the options presented in chapter 3 led to the choice of continuing research and development with a limiting treaty (Option 3A) as the highest scoring option.