Arguing that judges sacrifice individual rights by using less than their full powers in order to appear democratically legitimate, Robert Leckey provides a detailed comparative account of how judges apply new bills of rights in Canada, South Africa and the United Kingdom, and how their practices deny justice to individuals.
Arguing that judges sacrifice individual rights by using less than their full powers in order to appear democratically legitimate, Robert Leckey provides a detailed comparative account of how judges apply new bills of rights in Canada, South Africa and the United Kingdom, and how their practices deny justice to individuals.
Robert Leckey is an associate professor and William Dawson Scholar in the Faculty of Law and director of the Paul-André Crépeau Centre for Private and Comparative Law at McGill University, where he researches in comparative law, constitutional law and family law.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction 1. Against Bill of Rights exceptionalism 2. The common law, judging, and three Bills of Rights 3. Judicial review of legislation before Bills of Rights 4. Bills of Rights and other means of accessing judgment 5. Putting the strike-down in its place 6. Remedies from text to practice 7. Improving the system and engaging the legislature 8. Rethinking remedies and constitutional supremacy Conclusion.
Introduction 1. Against Bill of Rights exceptionalism 2. The common law, judging, and three Bills of Rights 3. Judicial review of legislation before Bills of Rights 4. Bills of Rights and other means of accessing judgment 5. Putting the strike-down in its place 6. Remedies from text to practice 7. Improving the system and engaging the legislature 8. Rethinking remedies and constitutional supremacy Conclusion.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309