Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![U.S. Army Fielding Options for the Objective Force Warrior]( "U.S. Army Fielding Options for the Objective Force Warrior")
U.S. Army Fielding Options for the Objective Force Warrior59,99 €![Unmanned Aerial Warfare: Strategic Help or Hindrance?]( "Unmanned Aerial Warfare: Strategic Help or Hindrance?")
Unmanned Aerial Warfare: Strategic Help or Hindrance?59,99 €![Tactical Reconnaissance: UAVs versus Manned Aircraft]( "Tactical Reconnaissance: UAVs versus Manned Aircraft")
Tactical Reconnaissance: UAVs versus Manned Aircraft59,99 €![The Last Manned Fighter: Replacing Manned Fighters with Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles]( "The Last Manned Fighter: Replacing Manned Fighters with Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles")
The Last Manned Fighter: Replacing Manned Fighters with Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles59,99 €![Considerations for Improving Tactical Reconnaissance: The Eyes of the Combat Commander]( "Considerations for Improving Tactical Reconnaissance: The Eyes of the Combat Commander")
Considerations for Improving Tactical Reconnaissance: The Eyes of the Combat Commander59,99 €![Asymmetries of a Warrior-Class Society]( "Asymmetries of a Warrior-Class Society")
Asymmetries of a Warrior-Class Society59,99 €![Scaling Flight Tests of Unmanned Air Vehicles]( "Scaling Flight Tests of Unmanned Air Vehicles")
Scaling Flight Tests of Unmanned Air Vehicles59,99 €
"This study analyzes the relative effectiveness of the services' UASs in meeting national security objectives in the context of the Global War on Terror and future wars. Given the similarity in the air vehicles, the UAS' C2 and sustainment mechanisms served as the basis of comparing the service solutions. The hedging constructs in the National Security and Defense Strategies provided the criteria for this comparison. This analysis revealed that both services' UASs could serve as effective hedges to meet requirements for most of the scenarios examined. Further, relative to each other, the service's UASs are equally effective in the aggregate, but the Air Force's remote-split operations (RSO) concept has greater potential capability due to its inherent flexibility and adaptivity. However, shortfalls in the Air Force's C2 and sustainment mechanisms have prevented RSO from reaching its full potential. In contrast, effective management of the Army's corresponding mechanisms facilitates its UAS' service as a hedge."