51,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
payback
26 °P sammeln
  • Broschiertes Buch

Discussion on the introduction of the smoking ban in Ticino has all the characteristics of a debate, where every participant takes a position. In this context, observing argumentative content means reconstructing the core of the discussion. However the goal of understanding argumentative content is difficult to achieve because argumentation is a complex activity. Content analysis allows reconstruction of a small part of the content and the core question of the thesis arises from this observation. Main aim of the thesis lays on a methodological level. The question is how can we best describe…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
Discussion on the introduction of the smoking ban in Ticino has all the characteristics of a debate, where every participant takes a position. In this context, observing argumentative content means reconstructing the core of the discussion. However the goal of understanding argumentative content is difficult to achieve because argumentation is a complex activity. Content analysis allows reconstruction of a small part of the content and the core question of the thesis arises from this observation. Main aim of the thesis lays on a methodological level. The question is how can we best describe argumentative content? and is developed throughout the study until the final question is formulated: to what extent can the argumentation theory help in constructing the most expressive content analysis?
Autorenporträt
Maddalena Fiordelli accomplished her PhD study (March 2009) in the field of Health Communication with a thesis on a Public Health issue: smoking ban in Ticino. She graduated at the Faculty of Communication Sciences at the Università della Svizzera italiana with a major in Technologies for Communication in December 2002.