51,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei*
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
payback
26 °P sammeln
  • Gebundenes Buch

The NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. This volume critically analyses the NJAC judgment and provides a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India, analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges, and their application in the NJAC Case, and comparatively examines thejudicial appointments process in six select foreign jurisdictions.

Produktbeschreibung
The NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. This volume critically analyses the NJAC judgment and provides a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India, analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges, and their application in the NJAC Case, and comparatively examines thejudicial appointments process in six select foreign jurisdictions.
Autorenporträt
Arghya Sengupta is the founder of and research director at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi. Ritwika Sharma is a research fellow at Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi.