Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Adopting a Single Planning Model at the Operational Level of War]( "Adopting a Single Planning Model at the Operational Level of War")
Adopting a Single Planning Model at the Operational Level of War60,99 €![Afghanistan Study Group: Operational Campaign Plan]( "Afghanistan Study Group: Operational Campaign Plan")
Afghanistan Study Group: Operational Campaign Plan60,99 €![Operational Employment of the Light Infantry Division]( "Operational Employment of the Light Infantry Division")
Operational Employment of the Light Infantry Division60,99 €![Unconventional Warfare at the Operational Level: The Chindits in Burma in World War II]( "Unconventional Warfare at the Operational Level: The Chindits in Burma in World War II")
Unconventional Warfare at the Operational Level: The Chindits in Burma in World War II60,99 €![Operational Shock and Complexity Theory]( "Operational Shock and Complexity Theory")
Operational Shock and Complexity Theory60,99 €![French and Polish Resistance During WWII: A Comparison]( "French and Polish Resistance During WWII: A Comparison")
French and Polish Resistance During WWII: A Comparison60,99 €![Operational Art of Blitzkrieg: Its Strengths and Weaknesses in Systems Perspective]( "Operational Art of Blitzkrieg: Its Strengths and Weaknesses in Systems Perspective")
Operational Art of Blitzkrieg: Its Strengths and Weaknesses in Systems Perspective60,99 €
Changes in the operating environment have resulted in a fundamental change to the shape and nature of peace operations (PO). The result is that PO have become closer in nature to intervention operations, with a focus on peace enforcement operations, rather than the traditional peacekeeping operations upon which most nations developed their PO doctrine. This has resulted in changes to PO doctrine by Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Given that doctrine establishes the conceptual framework for how militaries conduct operations; a common doctrine is desired to ensure interoperability among allies and coalition members. Conversely, differences in doctrine can result in differing attitudes, approaches, and foci when the doctrine is operationalized for a particular mission. Thus, the intent of this paper is to determine if and where Canadian, American, and British operational-level PO doctrines diverge and converge.