Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Examining the Social Contract Theory: A Case of Refugee Crisis]( "Examining the Social Contract Theory: A Case of Refugee Crisis")
Examining the Social Contract Theory: A Case of Refugee Crisis23,99 €![The (return) to the state of nature in the international sphere in Hobbes]( "The (return) to the state of nature in the international sphere in Hobbes")
The (return) to the state of nature in the international sphere in Hobbes36,99 €![The Social Contract of the Firm]( "The Social Contract of the Firm")
The Social Contract of the Firm37,99 €![On Utilitarianism and Human Rights]( "On Utilitarianism and Human Rights")
On Utilitarianism and Human Rights55,99 €![State and Individual: Political Concepts In Modern Political Writings]( "State and Individual: Political Concepts In Modern Political Writings")
State and Individual: Political Concepts In Modern Political Writings23,99 €![Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law]( "Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law")
Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law39,99 €![Analyse de l'état de nature et du contrat social chez Hobbes et Locke]( "Analyse de l'état de nature et du contrat social chez Hobbes et Locke")
Analyse de l'état de nature et du contrat social chez Hobbes et Locke32,99 €
This book mainly focused on a comparative analysis of state of nature and social contract in Thomas Hobbes and John Locke political philosophy. Though there are differences between them in adddresing state of nature, which this book explored, for both of them state of nature has so many inconveniences. It is to remedy inconveniences in state of nature that they both argue for the neccesity of state, which should be formed with social contract. However, they differ in their account of social contract. For instance, Hobbes's social contract is somehow rigid that favors government power even at the expense of human liberty where as for Locke Government has only delegated power and the people can rightfully withdraw the government when it acts against the will of the people, and Locke advocated limited government.