Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Jacobs, White, and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights]( "Jacobs, White, and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights")
Jacobs, White, and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights52,00 €![Wedded Wife]( "Wedded Wife")
Wedded Wife14,99 €![Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction]( "Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction")
Symmetry: A Very Short Introduction10,99 €![The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention]( "The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention")
The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention259,99 €![Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Teamwork in Higher Education]( "Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Teamwork in Higher Education")
Innovative Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Teamwork in Higher Education39,99 €![The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]( "The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea")
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea743,99 €![Journal Of The Constitutional Convention Which Convened At Alexandria On The Thirteenth Day Of February 1864]( "Journal Of The Constitutional Convention Which Convened At Alexandria On The Thirteenth Day Of February 1864")
Journal Of The Constitutional Convention Which Convened At Alexandria On The Thirteenth Day Of February 186427,99 €
In the last few years, notions like 'asymmetric warfare,' and, more recently, 'hybrid warfare' have become as common and pervasive as to appear like new orthodoxy in military thought.
This U.S. Army War College International Fellow student author examines these theories through the lens of critical thinking and argues that these 'new' constructs are anything but original.
Analyzing two historical case studies, the First Jewish-Roman War (66-73 CE) and the Philippine-American War (1899-1902 CE), he demonstrates that asymmetry and hybridism have been common characteristics of war through the ages since the very beginning of humanity.
This U.S. Army War College International Fellow student author examines these theories through the lens of critical thinking and argues that these 'new' constructs are anything but original.
Analyzing two historical case studies, the First Jewish-Roman War (66-73 CE) and the Philippine-American War (1899-1902 CE), he demonstrates that asymmetry and hybridism have been common characteristics of war through the ages since the very beginning of humanity.