Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Examining the Adequacy of the English Enterprise Act 2002 in Cultivating a Rescue Culture]( "Examining the Adequacy of the English Enterprise Act 2002 in Cultivating a Rescue Culture")
Examining the Adequacy of the English Enterprise Act 2002 in Cultivating a Rescue Culture16,95 €![The Laws of Business, With Forms of Common Business and Legal Documents]( "The Laws of Business, With Forms of Common Business and Legal Documents")
The Laws of Business, With Forms of Common Business and Legal Documents36,99 €![The Effectiveness of Regulatory Regimes in Combating Virtual Currencies¿ Money Laundering Activities]( "The Effectiveness of Regulatory Regimes in Combating Virtual Currencies¿ Money Laundering Activities")
The Effectiveness of Regulatory Regimes in Combating Virtual Currencies¿ Money Laundering Activities27,95 €![Factors Affecting Profitability and Sustainability of Government University's Enterprise]( "Factors Affecting Profitability and Sustainability of Government University's Enterprise")
Factors Affecting Profitability and Sustainability of Government University's Enterprise23,99 €![Enterprise as an Object of Civil Rights]( "Enterprise as an Object of Civil Rights")
Enterprise as an Object of Civil Rights44,99 €![BVR's Guide to Personal v. Enterprise Goodwill, Fifth Edition]( "BVR's Guide to Personal v. Enterprise Goodwill, Fifth Edition")
BVR's Guide to Personal v. Enterprise Goodwill, Fifth Edition189,99 €![Social Enterprise Law]( "Social Enterprise Law")
Social Enterprise Law240,99 €
Research Paper (postgraduate) from the year 2009 in the subject Law - Civil / Private / Industrial / Labour, grade: A-, University of Basel (Europainstitut), course: Social-Non Discrimination Law, language: English, abstract: The judgments of the European Court of Justice (hereinafter "ECJ") are not often covered bymedia. With an exception, there are some cases that have a great impact in everyday life ofnationals of the European Union (hereinafter "EU"). One of such cases is the long-awaitedAge Concern England, which is significant for confirming that Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 thNovember 2000 (Employment Equality Directive, hereinafter "Directive") prohibitsdiscrimination on grounds of age.On 5th March 2009, the ECJ referred a decision back to the High Court after clarifying thatsocial policy objectives "such as those related to employment and the labour market" may beconsidered legitimate under EC law. This means that employers can still lawfully dismissemployees at the age of65. In the context of Directive, the present case both covers personalscope (the Directives apply to all persons: natural and legal, in the EU regardless ofnationality, public and private sector) and material scope (question if retirement ages coveredby Directive).In fact, Age Concern England case "enriches case law of discrimination on grounds of age,especially on the obligations of the Member States (hereinafter, "MS") in respect of theprohibition of discrimination on grounds of age laid down in Article 2 (hereinafter - "Art.")of Directive, particularly the degree with which that prohibition must be transposed intonational law." Moreover, Age Concern England continues case law of earlier cases involvingarguments regarding discrimination on grounds of age, for example, Mangold, Lindorfer,Palacios de la Villa and Bartsch.Opinions among employment lawyers and other experts differ regarding the implications ofthe Age Concern England judgment. For employers, generally, this is a good decision; theycan dismiss employees if they wish to. On balance, this is crucial judgment for workers aged65 and over. There are approximately ten thousand people aged 65 that are forcibly dismissedevery year in United Kingdom (hereinafter "UK").