This book argues that a conscientiously objecting medical professional should receive an exemption only if the grounds of an objector's refusal are reasonable. It defends a detailed, contextual account of public reasonability suited for healthcare, which builds from the overarching concept of Rawlsian public reason.
This book argues that a conscientiously objecting medical professional should receive an exemption only if the grounds of an objector's refusal are reasonable. It defends a detailed, contextual account of public reasonability suited for healthcare, which builds from the overarching concept of Rawlsian public reason.
Robert F. Card is Professor of Philosophy at the State University of New York Oswego. He has been Fellow in Clinical Ethics and Visiting Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC), as well as Scholar in Residence in the Division of Medical Humanities and Bioethics at URMC.
Inhaltsangabe
Chapter 1 The Main Considerations Chapter 2: The Inescapability of Reasons-Assessment Chapter 3: Developing the Reasonability View Chapter 4: Further Developing the Reasonability View Chapter 5: From Objections to Exemptions: Establishing Conscientious Objector Status in Medicine Chapter 6: Alternative Views, Objections, and Replies
Chapter 1 The Main Considerations Chapter 2: The Inescapability of Reasons-Assessment Chapter 3: Developing the Reasonability View Chapter 4: Further Developing the Reasonability View Chapter 5: From Objections to Exemptions: Establishing Conscientious Objector Status in Medicine Chapter 6: Alternative Views, Objections, and Replies
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309