Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Has the Loss of Organic Long Range Maritime Assets Put the Carrier Strike Group at Risk?]( "Has the Loss of Organic Long Range Maritime Assets Put the Carrier Strike Group at Risk?")
Has the Loss of Organic Long Range Maritime Assets Put the Carrier Strike Group at Risk?59,99 €![The Need for Speed: Hypersonic Aircraft and the Transformation of Long Range Airpower]( "The Need for Speed: Hypersonic Aircraft and the Transformation of Long Range Airpower")
The Need for Speed: Hypersonic Aircraft and the Transformation of Long Range Airpower60,99 €![The Value of Long-Range Strike: Using History as a Guide for the Future]( "The Value of Long-Range Strike: Using History as a Guide for the Future")
The Value of Long-Range Strike: Using History as a Guide for the Future59,99 €![Data Mining Atmospheric/Oceanic Parameters in the Design of a Long-Range Nephelometric Forecast Tool]( "Data Mining Atmospheric/Oceanic Parameters in the Design of a Long-Range Nephelometric Forecast Tool")
Data Mining Atmospheric/Oceanic Parameters in the Design of a Long-Range Nephelometric Forecast Tool60,99 €![The Neglect of Long-Range Escort Development During the Interwar Years (1918 - 1943)]( "The Neglect of Long-Range Escort Development During the Interwar Years (1918 - 1943)")
The Neglect of Long-Range Escort Development During the Interwar Years (1918 - 1943)60,99 €![Exploration of Teleconnection Indices for Long-Range Seasonal Temperature Forecasts]( "Exploration of Teleconnection Indices for Long-Range Seasonal Temperature Forecasts")
Exploration of Teleconnection Indices for Long-Range Seasonal Temperature Forecasts60,99 €![Long-Range Surveillance Unit Force Structure in Force XXI]( "Long-Range Surveillance Unit Force Structure in Force XXI")
Long-Range Surveillance Unit Force Structure in Force XXI60,99 €
The United States Air Force today faces the challenge of allocating development resources to prepare for future force projection requirements. In particular, the Air Force's core competency of Global Attack implies a future capability that can quickly and successfully deliver combat effects anywhere in the world with impunity. Understanding that the future threat environment is dynamic and that continued advancements by adversaries will likely degrade the technical superiority of today's weapon systems, the need arises for a planning model to direct development funding to areas with the greatest probability of successfully defending the strike vehicle of 2035. Examining this problem posed two distinct challenges. The first was to determine the most likely course of Integrated Air Defense System technology through the time period of interest--allowing for plausible disruptive technologies that generate orders-of-magnitude improvement in capability or even change the nature of air defense systems. The second challenge was to characterize future adversaries--requiring a broad look at political and economic trends as presented in AF 2025, SPACECAST 2020 and other relevant future studies. Based on these studies, threat scenarios were generated from technical assessments of emerging technologies and evaluated using the Risk Filtering, Ranking and Management (RFRM) technique (Haimes, 2004) to explore the most severe threats to a future global strike air vehicle. The application of RFRM to the problem created a coherent threat hierarchy that enables the decision maker to examine anticipated hostile systems that may counter key U.S. strengths of stealth, speed, and high altitude operations.