Concept of the liability for WLAN usage under German jurisdiction Risks for private WLAN usage
-
- Taschenbuch
- eBook ausgewählt
-
Form:Einzelkauf Download
-
Sprache:Deutsch
5,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
ePUB
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Nein
Text-to-Speech
Ja
Erscheinungsdatum
13.08.2012
Verlag
GRINSeitenzahl
10 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
409 KB
Auflage
1. Auflage
Sprache
Deutsch
EAN
9783656256328
Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich BWL - Informationswissenschaften, Informationsmanagement, Note: noch keine, Hochschule Darmstadt (Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften), Veranstaltung: Social Media and the Freedom of Web, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Since using private WLAN networks has been established the legal situation was often negotiated under German jurisdiction. This homework approaches the risks of private Wireless LAN usage and the juridical consequences.
Especially the liability for violations of third people is a common issue in terms of the "liability for interference" . Usually copyright violations lead to high compensation requests for network operators. In the last few years many lawyers specialized in admonishing copyright violators what is often called "admonishing industry". This practice is often criticized because it's not clear to which extent operators are responsible for foreign violations.
But also the access on foreign networks without the operator's consent was an often negotiated issue. In this case the judges have to weigh between the interests of the network operator and the foreign user. Based on that reason this topic is also treated in this homework.
The homework is mainly based on real cases which really occurred under German jurisdiction. That means that I examined potential situations only marginal because forecasts about possible verdicts would be highly speculative. For the development of the work original verdicts of several courts and other professional texts and valuations were used.
This text is parted into three parts. The first part deals with the main risks concerning network operators and users. The second part is about the juridical consequences which result from these risks. The third part is a valuation of the current juridical situation taking regard to the law, especially the German Telecommunication Act , the Teleservices Act , the Copyright Act and marginally the Civil Code and the Criminal Code .
The work demonstrates similarities but also huge discrepancies between the legislation and the jurisdiction. These differences which are often criticized are the result of generous interpretation of the laws.
Especially the liability for violations of third people is a common issue in terms of the "liability for interference" . Usually copyright violations lead to high compensation requests for network operators. In the last few years many lawyers specialized in admonishing copyright violators what is often called "admonishing industry". This practice is often criticized because it's not clear to which extent operators are responsible for foreign violations.
But also the access on foreign networks without the operator's consent was an often negotiated issue. In this case the judges have to weigh between the interests of the network operator and the foreign user. Based on that reason this topic is also treated in this homework.
The homework is mainly based on real cases which really occurred under German jurisdiction. That means that I examined potential situations only marginal because forecasts about possible verdicts would be highly speculative. For the development of the work original verdicts of several courts and other professional texts and valuations were used.
This text is parted into three parts. The first part deals with the main risks concerning network operators and users. The second part is about the juridical consequences which result from these risks. The third part is a valuation of the current juridical situation taking regard to the law, especially the German Telecommunication Act , the Teleservices Act , the Copyright Act and marginally the Civil Code and the Criminal Code .
The work demonstrates similarities but also huge discrepancies between the legislation and the jurisdiction. These differences which are often criticized are the result of generous interpretation of the laws.
Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback
Wir nutzen dein Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte habe Verständnis, dass wir dir keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls du Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchtest, kannst du dich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice