Challenges the persistent orthodoxies of the Tokyo tribunal and provides a new framework for evaluating the trial, revealing its importance to international jurisprudence.
Challenges the persistent orthodoxies of the Tokyo tribunal and provides a new framework for evaluating the trial, revealing its importance to international jurisprudence.
David Cohen directs the WSD Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice at Stanford University, California (formerly the War Crimes Studies Center at the University of California, Berkeley, where Cohen taught for thirty-five years before moving the Center to Stanford in 2013). He publishes on international criminal law, transitional justice, human rights, classics, and comparative legal history, while also directing human rights, rule of law, and accountability projects in South and Southeast Asia and Africa.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction Part I. The Allied War Crimes Policy, the Indictment, and Court Proceedings: 1. The framework of the trial 2. Charges of crimes against peace 3. The Japanese system of government 4. Individual roles in the making of the war and the overall conspiracy 5. Counts on murder, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity 6. Accountability of war crimes Part II. Law and Jurisprudence of the Judgments and Separate Opinions: 7. The majority judgment: crimes against peace 8. An alternative perspective on accountability for crimes against peace: the two Webb judgments 9. The majority judgment on war crimes 10. An alternative Tokyo judgment: the draft Webb judgment on war crimes 11. The dissenting opinions by Justices Bernard and Roeling 12. Pal's 'judgment', or dissenting opinion, on crimes against peace 13. Pal's treatment of war crimes charges 14. The concurring opinions of Justices Webb and Jaranilla Conclusion.
Introduction Part I. The Allied War Crimes Policy, the Indictment, and Court Proceedings: 1. The framework of the trial 2. Charges of crimes against peace 3. The Japanese system of government 4. Individual roles in the making of the war and the overall conspiracy 5. Counts on murder, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity 6. Accountability of war crimes Part II. Law and Jurisprudence of the Judgments and Separate Opinions: 7. The majority judgment: crimes against peace 8. An alternative perspective on accountability for crimes against peace: the two Webb judgments 9. The majority judgment on war crimes 10. An alternative Tokyo judgment: the draft Webb judgment on war crimes 11. The dissenting opinions by Justices Bernard and Roeling 12. Pal's 'judgment', or dissenting opinion, on crimes against peace 13. Pal's treatment of war crimes charges 14. The concurring opinions of Justices Webb and Jaranilla Conclusion.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
