Party identification may be the single most powerful predictor of voting behavior, yet scholars disagree on whether this is good or bad for democracy. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind provides a window into the nature of party identification by examining circumstances in which political attitudes and party identities collide.
Party identification may be the single most powerful predictor of voting behavior, yet scholars disagree on whether this is good or bad for democracy. Competing Motives in the Partisan Mind provides a window into the nature of party identification by examining circumstances in which political attitudes and party identities collide.
Eric Groenendyk is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Memphis. He received his Ph.D. in political science from the University of Michigan in 2009. His research investigates the motivations and emotions underlying public opinion and political behavior. His work has appeared in Journal of Politics, Political Behavior, Political Psychology, Communication Research, and Emotion Review.
Inhaltsangabe
Introduction 1. A Dual Motivations Theory 2. Identity Justification: Identifying with the "Lesser of Two Evils" 3. Identity Justification: Issue Reprioritization 4. Cognitive Resources and Resistance to Identity Change 5. Motivation and Measurement Error 6. The Paradox of Partisan Responsiveness 7. Motivation and Democracy References
Introduction 1. A Dual Motivations Theory 2. Identity Justification: Identifying with the "Lesser of Two Evils" 3. Identity Justification: Issue Reprioritization 4. Cognitive Resources and Resistance to Identity Change 5. Motivation and Measurement Error 6. The Paradox of Partisan Responsiveness 7. Motivation and Democracy References
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309