Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Differences in the usage of finite adverbial concessive clauses. A replication study of "e;Gender Differences in English Syntax"e; by Britta Mondorf]( "Differences in the usage of finite adverbial concessive clauses. A replication study of "e;Gender Differences in English Syntax"e; by Britta Mondorf")
Differences in the usage of finite adverbial concessive clauses. A replication study of "e;Gender Differences in English Syntax"e; by Britta Mondorf17,95 €![Corpus-based analysis of the partial synonyms "e;oppress, repress, suppress"e; with regard to their contextual usage]( "Corpus-based analysis of the partial synonyms "e;oppress, repress, suppress"e; with regard to their contextual usage")
Corpus-based analysis of the partial synonyms "e;oppress, repress, suppress"e; with regard to their contextual usage15,95 €![Analysis of 120 student's written work and how to improve their Writing Performance]( "Analysis of 120 student's written work and how to improve their Writing Performance")
Analysis of 120 student's written work and how to improve their Writing Performance17,95 €![¿Its own language of key, scale and colour¿. The Challenges of Distinctive Characterisation and World Building in First-Person Narratives]( "¿Its own language of key, scale and colour¿. The Challenges of Distinctive Characterisation and World Building in First-Person Narratives")
¿Its own language of key, scale and colour¿. The Challenges of Distinctive Characterisation and World Building in First-Person Narratives15,95 €![The Pronounciation of German Loanwords in English. An Analysis of Phonological Differences]( "The Pronounciation of German Loanwords in English. An Analysis of Phonological Differences")
The Pronounciation of German Loanwords in English. An Analysis of Phonological Differences13,99 €![The Future Tenses: Will-Future and Going-to-Future - Formation and Usage]( "The Future Tenses: Will-Future and Going-to-Future - Formation and Usage")
The Future Tenses: Will-Future and Going-to-Future - Formation and Usage16,95 €!["e;Million Dollar Baby"e; as a film adaption. An analysis of major similarities and differences between the short story and the film]( ""e;Million Dollar Baby"e; as a film adaption. An analysis of major similarities and differences between the short story and the film")
"e;Million Dollar Baby"e; as a film adaption. An analysis of major similarities and differences between the short story and the film17,95 €
![Differences in the usage of finite adverbial concessive clauses. A replication study of "e;Gender Differences in English Syntax"e; by Britta Mondorf](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/43/43658/43658829n.jpg "Differences in the usage of finite adverbial concessive clauses. A replication study of "e;Gender Differences in English Syntax"e; by Britta Mondorf")
![Corpus-based analysis of the partial synonyms "e;oppress, repress, suppress"e; with regard to their contextual usage](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/24/24225/24225676n.jpg "Corpus-based analysis of the partial synonyms "e;oppress, repress, suppress"e; with regard to their contextual usage")
!["e;Million Dollar Baby"e; as a film adaption. An analysis of major similarities and differences between the short story and the film](https://bilder.buecher.de/produkte/48/48830/48830857n.jpg ""e;Million Dollar Baby"e; as a film adaption. An analysis of major similarities and differences between the short story and the film")
Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2016 im Fachbereich Anglistik - Linguistik, Note: 2,3, Universität Hamburg, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: Do I have to write this term paper or must I? Is there even a semantic difference between the two constructions have/has to + V and must + V? Epistemically, there is little diference between the two constructions, but a deontic approach shows that the construction must + V obliges the subject of the sentence to do something, while the construction have/has to + V does not play a strong deontic role. Nevertheless, native speakers of the English language use both constructions more or less indiscriminately.This term paper rejects the common approach that the two constructions are semantically identical, since certain verbs are more likely to occur in the have/has to + V-construction, than in the must + V-construction.According to Gries and Stefanowitsch, traditional linguistic studies view the lexicon and the grammar of a language as two completely diferent phenomena. In their cited publication, they state that "various expression types that fall somewhere in between lexicon and grammar have been recognized but largely ignored by mainstream syntactic theories" (Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2003, 209). Over the past decades, however, a variety of linguists, such as Lewis Hunston, Sinclair, Gries and Stefanowitsch themselves, have published a variety of theories, which approach a diferent view towards the connections between grammar and lexicon. These theories assume that "grammar and lexicon are not fundamentally diferent, and that the long-ignored multi-word expressions serve as an important link between them" (Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2003, 210). Following these theories, pairs of semantically more-or-less corresponding expressions and constructions, as the ones shown in (1) to (3), have occupied the attention of linguists all over the world (Gries & Stefanowitsch, 2004, 97):(1) Peter gave Mary the ball / Peter gave the ball to Mary(2)Frank is going to be happy / Frank will be happy(3) Peter must give Mary the ball / Peter has to give Mary the ball