Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Women and the Criminal Justice System]( "Women and the Criminal Justice System")
Women and the Criminal Justice System110,99 €![Women and the Criminal Justice System]( "Women and the Criminal Justice System")
Women and the Criminal Justice System110,99 €![Governance, Social Control and Legal Reform in China]( "Governance, Social Control and Legal Reform in China")
Governance, Social Control and Legal Reform in China123,04 €![Governance, Social Control and Legal Reform in China]( "Governance, Social Control and Legal Reform in China")
Governance, Social Control and Legal Reform in China85,99 €![PENOLOGY - How far does the empirical evidence support the view that ¿nothing works¿ in the punishment of the offenders?]( "PENOLOGY - How far does the empirical evidence support the view that ¿nothing works¿ in the punishment of the offenders?")
PENOLOGY - How far does the empirical evidence support the view that ¿nothing works¿ in the punishment of the offenders?15,95 €![Popular Participation in Japanese Criminal Justice]( "Popular Participation in Japanese Criminal Justice")
Popular Participation in Japanese Criminal Justice37,99 €![Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation]( "Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation")
Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation167,99 €
Academic Paper from the year 2014 in the subject Law - Criminal process, Criminology, Law Enforcement, grade: 61, , course: Corporate Law, language: English, abstract: The aspirations of this essay will be to examine the discretion which Irish judges seem to have when sentencing criminal offenders, and to also examine what diversifications could be made to curtail their exercising of this discretion. To do this accurately I will make a parallel comparison with similar jurisdiction's such as England and Wales but will also compare it to jurisdictions not so similar such as the US and Australia.