"This excellent collection directs much deserved attention to the meta-philosophical and meta-metaphysical debates within and surrounding the German idealist tradition about the nature and form of metaphysical and philosophical knowledge as well as its relationship to skepticism, dogmatism and empirical experience.
To this effect, the book reconstructs the most relevant arguments about the nature of scientific metaphysics by the pre-Kantian thinkers Wolff and Baumgarten before engaging in detail with Kant's re-definition of the metaphysical enterprise as well as his critique of rationalism and examining the responses by post-Kantian thinkers such as Schulze, Reinhold, Fichte, Hegel and Schelling.
Going beyond the confines
of historical reconstruction, the contemporary and systematic relevance of the discussed positions provides a consistent and most rewarding focal point for the accomplished contributors."
Sebastian Stein,
Universität Heidelberg, Germany"This excellent collection of essays examines a crucial but often neglected thread running through Classical German Philosophy from Wolff to Hegel: the 'meta-metaphysical' idea that metaphysics itself should be a 'science'. The essays, which are impressive in their scholarship and eminently readable, pay close attention to the sometimes subtle, sometimes significant differences between Wolff, Kant, Reinhold, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel (and others). Yet they also enable the reader to see the easily overlooked
continuity that unites these thinkers into an identifiable tradition: the thought that metaphysics must be systematic, demonstrative and rational. The essays also consider the relation between such 'scientific' metaphysics and a wide range of other disciplines, such as geometry and theology, and other concepts, such as freedom, idealism and scepticism. In so doing, these essays cast an original and very welcome light on one of the greatest periods of philosophy in our history."
Stephen Houlgate,
University of Warwick, UK"It has become customary to oppose scientific rigor to metaphysical laxity. This volume shows why this opposition should not be taken for granted. Revisiting an extraordinarily fertile moment in the history of philosophy, it considers why philosophers argued that metaphysics should aspire to science and science should aspire to metaphysics. Anyone interested in debates about the nature and limits of science, naturalism, and metaphysics, will find this volume indispensable."
Raymond Brassier,
American University of Beirut
