eBook, PDF

Comparing Kant and Sartre (eBook, PDF)

Beschreibung

For a long time, commentators viewed Sartre as one of Kant's significant twentieth-century critics. Recent research of their philosophies has discovered that Sartre's relation to Kant's work manifests an 'anxiety of influence', which masks more profound similarities. This volume of newly written comparative essays is the first edited collection on the philosophies of Kant and Sartre. The volume focuses on issues in metaphysics, metaethics and metaphilosophy, and explores the similarities and differences between the two authors, as well as the complementarity of some of their views, particularly on autonomy, happiness, self-consciousness, evil, temporality, imagination and the nature of philosophy.

Technische Details

• Geräte: PC
• ohne Kopierschutz
• Größe: 3.77MB

Barrierefreiheit

• Text-to-Speech

Autor

Sorin Baiasu is a Reader in Philosophy at Keele University (UK) and has held visiting positions at the Universities of Sheffield, Vienna and Oxford. He is the author of Kant and Sartre: Re-discovering Critical Ethics (Palgrave Macmillan) as well as editor or co-editor of Politics and Metaphysics in Kant, Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretive Essays, The Kantian Mind and Kantians Sincerity in Politics and International Relations. He has published essays in various journals, including Sartre Studies International, International Journal of Philosophical Studies and The Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK
• Seitenzahl: 262
• Erscheinungstermin: 29. April 2016
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781137454539
• Artikelnr.: 44961997

Rezensionen

By John Russon, Guelph

In my judgment this is a very good proposal, and the project is worth pursuing.

This volume intends to map out the relatively uncharted domain of the relationship between philosophies of Kant and Sartre. While Kant is widely recognized as the founding figure of the tradition of Continental philosophy to which Sartre himself belongs, more direct connections between the figures are not widely studied. This work promises to demonstrate a broadly grounded compatibility between the two thinkers, documenting important connections between their approaches to subjectivity, metaphysics, ethics, and more.

I think this is quite a worthwhile project, and will be of interest to scholars in Continental

philosophy (primarily graduate students and faculty).

The sequence of proposed topics of study, as articulated through the abstracts, seems to me to be very well designed to draw important connections between these two thinkers both at a very fundamental, theoretical level, (addressing such topics as the transcendental unity of appreception/pre-reflective cogito, temporality and reflection), and at the level of their most developed reflections on the deepest existential and ethical issues of human life, (addressing such topics as bad faith, happiness and evil). I think the topics are appropriately fundamental and comprehensive.

I do not know many of the individual contributors (most of whom are centred in the UK), but the abstracts are very good, and attest to the high quality of the proposed contributions.

I also think this book is quite original and distinctive: I do not know of any other volume that covers this important ground.

I am quite confident that this will be an excellent volume and a worthwhile contribution to contemporary philosophical research.

Author's Response

I have two comments with regard to the review: one concerns the area of interest - the volume is not only designed to readers of Continental philosophy; all contributors write in an accessible style, which is common to both good analytic and continental philosophy, and some of them would define themselves as primarily analytic, although they may also write on the work of philosophers usually placed in the continental tradition. The second comment is about the aim of the volume - the volume aims to present some of the similarities between Kant and Sartre, but does this without neglecting their differences.