Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Role-playing and Onomastics: J.R.R. Tolkien's influence on the naming of fictional characters in role-playing games]( "Role-playing and Onomastics: J.R.R. Tolkien's influence on the naming of fictional characters in role-playing games")
Role-playing and Onomastics: J.R.R. Tolkien's influence on the naming of fictional characters in role-playing games17,95 €![How England lost the american colonies]( "How England lost the american colonies")
How England lost the american colonies15,95 €![Supernaturally Lost - TV-series as a modern form of narrative]( "Supernaturally Lost - TV-series as a modern form of narrative")
Supernaturally Lost - TV-series as a modern form of narrative47,95 €![Snape and the Question of Good and Evil in Rowlings Harry Potter Series]( "Snape and the Question of Good and Evil in Rowlings Harry Potter Series")
Snape and the Question of Good and Evil in Rowlings Harry Potter Series17,95 €![Fawlty Towers. The portrayal of foreign characters in the series]( "Fawlty Towers. The portrayal of foreign characters in the series")
Fawlty Towers. The portrayal of foreign characters in the series15,95 €![Dreams of lost humanity? A Marxist analysis of]( "Dreams of lost humanity? A Marxist analysis of")
Dreams of lost humanity? A Marxist analysis of "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" by Philip K. Dick17,95 €![The role of TV in a globalised world]( "The role of TV in a globalised world")
The role of TV in a globalised world15,95 €
Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject Didactics for the subject English - Pedagogy, Literature Studies, grade: 2,0, University of Cologne (Philosophische Fakultät / Englische Seminar 1), course: Onomastics, language: English, abstract: 1Intro2Names of theotechny2.1Benjamin Linus2.2James (Sawyer) Ford2.3Jacob2.4Desmond and Penelope2.5Dharma2.6Christian Shephard3Famous names3.1Henry Gale3.2Daniel Faraday3.3Desmond David Hume3.4Danielle Rousseau3.5Further references4Reference to literature4.1The adventures of Tom Sawyer4.2The Wizard of Oz4.3Lord of the flies4.4Addendum5Anagrams5.1Ethan Rome5.2Mittelos Bioscience5.3Herarat Aviation5.3.1Amelia Earhart5.3.2A variation earth5.4Further Anagrams6Mixed patterns6.1Gale Island6.2Linus6.3Sayid Jarrah6.4Claire Littelton6.5Jack's Tattoo6.6Literal meaning of names7ConclusionUntil the ninth century it was not likely to have a first and a last name, but by that time things started to change. In Venice the indication of surnames began in this time period, France (10th/11th century) and the German-speaking area (12th century) followed this example (Kohlheim 1996: 1280), so the common practice of naming changed and thenceforth people were called by both, forename and surname. This giving of names led to the science of onomastics - representing a separate discipline (Wittkowski 1995: 289) -, whose purpose basically is "die Geschichte und den Gebrauch eines Namens zu klären und mögliche Schlüsse daraus zu ziehen" (Hansack 2004: 51), as the character of naming had caused people to think about the meaning of personal names for centuries (Eichler 1995: 2). Such name-interpreting can also take the role of a poetic device and by this means as literary onomastic (Hansack 2004: 51) function as a link between linguistic and literary studies bearing on "the study of the way names function in fiction" (Ashley 1989: 198). The following term paper will take up this and consequently concentrate on the names of the characters in the TV series LOST. This idea came up after reading an article by Matthew Gilbert, who quoted Damon Lindelof - one of the makers of LOST - mentioning that not one name of the island's inhabitants was chosen incidentally but that every single name had a special meaning concerning the storyline (Gilbert 2005). Lindelof and co-producer J. J. Abrahams used "names that gesture outward from the series" in a way that "name[s] assists [the] definition of character[s], suggesting clues of [...] personality" and are an "entrance to that what [they] represent[s]; direction; past, current or future position" (Rowden 2000: 115) and therefore played "the name game quite shrewdly" (Gilbert 2005).