Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Hyperspectral Remote Sensing]( "Hyperspectral Remote Sensing")
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing79,99 €![Modeling of Transport Demand]( "Modeling of Transport Demand")
Modeling of Transport Demand100,99 €![Outlier Detection in Python]( "Outlier Detection in Python")
Outlier Detection in Python82,99 €![Post-Processing Resolution Enhancement of Open Skies Photographic Imagery]( "Post-Processing Resolution Enhancement of Open Skies Photographic Imagery")
Post-Processing Resolution Enhancement of Open Skies Photographic Imagery54,99 €![Robustness of Multiple Clustering Algorithms on Hyperspectral Images]( "Robustness of Multiple Clustering Algorithms on Hyperspectral Images")
Robustness of Multiple Clustering Algorithms on Hyperspectral Images54,99 €![A Dynamically Configurable Log-Based Distributed Security Event Detection Methodology Using Simple Event Correlator]( "A Dynamically Configurable Log-Based Distributed Security Event Detection Methodology Using Simple Event Correlator")
A Dynamically Configurable Log-Based Distributed Security Event Detection Methodology Using Simple Event Correlator54,99 €![Performance of Scattering Matrix Decomposition and Color Spaces for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery]( "Performance of Scattering Matrix Decomposition and Color Spaces for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery")
Performance of Scattering Matrix Decomposition and Color Spaces for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery54,99 €
Many multivariate techniques are available to find outliers in a hyperspectral image. Among the algorithms one may utilize is a global anomaly detector called Ellipsoidal Multivariate Trimming (MVT). In this paper we tested the efficacy of using the Closest Distance to Center (CDC) algorithm in conjunction with MVT to find outliers among a hyperspectral image. Since MVT is a global anomaly detector the images were first clustered using a variety of techniques. Among the hyperspectral images used for evaluation in this study, only one of the images contained more than 5% outliers in any given cluster set. Based upon the assumption that this is normally the case for most images, the standard use of 50% retention within MVT does not perform as well as using a higher value such as 95% for retention in MVT. This use of a higher number of observations for the estimate of the mean and covariance is shown to decrease the effect of swamping seen when using 50% retention. Furthermore, the use of CDC to initialize the MVT iteration process did not have any effect on outlier determination, but did increase the time to compute significantly.