John E. Hunter, Frank L. SchmidtCorrecting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Methods of Meta-Analysis
Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Herausgeber: Hunter, John E.
John E. Hunter, Frank L. SchmidtCorrecting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Methods of Meta-Analysis
Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Herausgeber: Hunter, John E.
- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Meta-analysis is arguably the most important methodological innovation in the social and behavioural sciences in the last 25 years. This revision of Hunter and Schmidt's book, Methods of Meta-Analysis (SAGE 1990), covers the important new developments in meta-analysis methods over the last 14 years. This edition presents an evaluation of fixed versus random effects models for meta-analysis, new methods for correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis, new developments in corrections for measurement error (including how to select the appropriate reliability coefficients to use), a…mehr
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Claudia KurtzMeta-analytische Studie zur Prognose von kriminellen Rückfällen auf der Basis empirischer Daten, m. CD-ROM30,00 €
- Matthew JonesResearching Organizations63,99 €
- 101 Coaching Strategies and Techniques25,99 €
- Alexandr KundinMeta-uchenie i sowremennaq äzotericheskaq nauka66,99 €
- Technology and Measurement around the Globe97,99 €
- Vincent ManneckDarstellung einer Metaanalyse am Beispiel einer Studie zur allgemeinen Intelligenz und beruflichem Erfolg in Deutschland15,95 €
- Sebastian OtteSchreiben über belastende Lebensereignisse49,00 €
-
-
-
Meta-analysis is arguably the most important methodological innovation in the social and behavioural sciences in the last 25 years. This revision of Hunter and Schmidt's book, Methods of Meta-Analysis (SAGE 1990), covers the important new developments in meta-analysis methods over the last 14 years. This edition presents an evaluation of fixed versus random effects models for meta-analysis, new methods for correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis, new developments in corrections for measurement error (including how to select the appropriate reliability coefficients to use), a discussion of a new Windows-based program package for applying the meta-analysis methods presented in the book, and a discussion of the theories of data underlying different approaches to meta-analysis. Coverage of these topics along with updated coverage of many other topics makes this book the most comprehensive text on meta-analysis methods available today.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Sage Publications
- 2. Aufl.
- Seitenzahl: 618
- Erscheinungstermin: 1. April 2004
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 254mm x 178mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 1092g
- ISBN-13: 9781412904797
- ISBN-10: 141290479X
- Artikelnr.: 14440906
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
- Verlag: Sage Publications
- 2. Aufl.
- Seitenzahl: 618
- Erscheinungstermin: 1. April 2004
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 254mm x 178mm x 33mm
- Gewicht: 1092g
- ISBN-13: 9781412904797
- ISBN-10: 141290479X
- Artikelnr.: 14440906
- Herstellerkennzeichnung
- Libri GmbH
- Europaallee 1
- 36244 Bad Hersfeld
- gpsr@libri.de
John E. (Jack) Hunter (1939--2002) was a professor in the Department of Psychology at Michigan State University. He received his Ph.D. in quantitative psychology from the University of Illinois. Jack coauthored four books and authored or coauthored over 200 articles and book chapters on a wide variety of methodological topics, including confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, measurement theory and methods, statistics, and research methods. He also published numerous research articles on such substantive topics as intelligence, attitude change, the relationship between attitudes and behavior, validity generalization, differential validity/selection fairness, and selection utility. Much of his research on attitudes was in the field of communications, and the American Communications Association named a research award in his honor. Professor Hunter received the Distinguished Scientific Award for Contributions to Applied Psychology from the American Psychological Association (APA) (jointly with Frank Schmidt) and the Distinguished Scientific Contributions Award from the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology (SIOP) (also jointly with Frank Schmidt). He was a Fellow of APA, APS, and SIOP, and was a past president of the Midwestern Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology. For the story of Jack's life, see Schmidt (2003).
Preface to 2nd Edition
Preface to 1st Edition
Acknowledgements
Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Integration Research Findings Across Studies
General problem and an example
Problems with statistical significance tests
Is statistical power the solution?
Confidence intervals
Meta-analysis
Role of meta-analysis in the behavioral and social sciences
Role of meta-analysis in theory development
Increasing use of meta-analysis
Meta-analysis in industrial-organizational psychology
Wider impact of meta-analysis on psychology
Impact of meta-analysis outside psychology
Meta-analysis and social policy
Meta-analysis and theories of data
Conclusions
Study Artifacts and Their Impact on Study Outcomes
Study Artifacts
Sampling error, statistical power, and the interpretation of research literatures
When and how to cumulate
Undercorrection for artifacts in the corrected standard deviation
Coding study characteristics and capitalization on sampling error in moderator analysis
A look ahead in the book
Meta-Analysis of Correlations
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Corrected Individually for Artifacts
Introduction and Overview
Bare bones meta-analysis: Correcting for sampling error only
Artifacts other than sampling error
Multiple simultaneous artifacts
Meta-analysis of individually corrected correlations
A worked example: Indirect range restriction
Summary of meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Exercise 1: Bare bones meta-analysis
Exercise 2: Meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Using Artifact Distributions
Full artifact distribution meta-analysis
Accuracy of corrections for artifacts
Mixed meta-analysis: Partial artifact information in individual studies
Summary of artifact distribution of meta-analysis of correlations
Exercise: Artifact distribution meta-analysis
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of Correlations
r versus : Which should be used?
r vs. regression slopes and intercepts in meta-analysis
Technical factors that cause overestimation of
Fixed and random models in meta-analysis
Credibility vs. confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Computing confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Range Restriction in meta-analysis: New technical analysis
Criticisms of meta-analysis procedures for correlations
Meta-Analysis of Experimental Effects and Other Dichotomous Comparisons
Treatment Effects: Experimental Artifacts and Their Impact
Quantification of the treatment effect: The d statistic and the point-biserial correlation
Sampling error in d values: Illustrations
Error of measurement in the dependent variable
Error of measurement in the treatment variable
Variation across studies in treatment strength
Range variation on the dependent variable
Dichotomization of the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the treatment variable
Bias in the effect size (d statistic)
Recording, computational, and transcriptional errors
Multiple artifacts and corrections
Meta-Analysis Methods for d Values
Effect size indices: d and r
An Alternative to d: Glass' d
Sampling error in the d statistic
Cumulation and correction of the variance for sampling error
Analysis of moderator variables
Correcting d values for measurement error in the dependent variable
Measurement error in the independent variable in experiments
Other artifacts and their effects
Correcting for multiple artifacts
Summary of meta-analysis of d values
Exercise: Meta-Analysis of d-Values
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of d Values
Alternative experimental designs
Within-subjects experimental designs
Meta-analysis and the within-subjects design
Statistical power in the two designs
Threats to internal and external validity
Bias in observed d values
Use of multiple regression in moderation analysis of d values
General Issues in Meta-Analysis
General Technical Issues in Meta-analysis
Fixed eff
Preface to 1st Edition
Acknowledgements
Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Integration Research Findings Across Studies
General problem and an example
Problems with statistical significance tests
Is statistical power the solution?
Confidence intervals
Meta-analysis
Role of meta-analysis in the behavioral and social sciences
Role of meta-analysis in theory development
Increasing use of meta-analysis
Meta-analysis in industrial-organizational psychology
Wider impact of meta-analysis on psychology
Impact of meta-analysis outside psychology
Meta-analysis and social policy
Meta-analysis and theories of data
Conclusions
Study Artifacts and Their Impact on Study Outcomes
Study Artifacts
Sampling error, statistical power, and the interpretation of research literatures
When and how to cumulate
Undercorrection for artifacts in the corrected standard deviation
Coding study characteristics and capitalization on sampling error in moderator analysis
A look ahead in the book
Meta-Analysis of Correlations
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Corrected Individually for Artifacts
Introduction and Overview
Bare bones meta-analysis: Correcting for sampling error only
Artifacts other than sampling error
Multiple simultaneous artifacts
Meta-analysis of individually corrected correlations
A worked example: Indirect range restriction
Summary of meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Exercise 1: Bare bones meta-analysis
Exercise 2: Meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Using Artifact Distributions
Full artifact distribution meta-analysis
Accuracy of corrections for artifacts
Mixed meta-analysis: Partial artifact information in individual studies
Summary of artifact distribution of meta-analysis of correlations
Exercise: Artifact distribution meta-analysis
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of Correlations
r versus : Which should be used?
r vs. regression slopes and intercepts in meta-analysis
Technical factors that cause overestimation of
Fixed and random models in meta-analysis
Credibility vs. confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Computing confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Range Restriction in meta-analysis: New technical analysis
Criticisms of meta-analysis procedures for correlations
Meta-Analysis of Experimental Effects and Other Dichotomous Comparisons
Treatment Effects: Experimental Artifacts and Their Impact
Quantification of the treatment effect: The d statistic and the point-biserial correlation
Sampling error in d values: Illustrations
Error of measurement in the dependent variable
Error of measurement in the treatment variable
Variation across studies in treatment strength
Range variation on the dependent variable
Dichotomization of the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the treatment variable
Bias in the effect size (d statistic)
Recording, computational, and transcriptional errors
Multiple artifacts and corrections
Meta-Analysis Methods for d Values
Effect size indices: d and r
An Alternative to d: Glass' d
Sampling error in the d statistic
Cumulation and correction of the variance for sampling error
Analysis of moderator variables
Correcting d values for measurement error in the dependent variable
Measurement error in the independent variable in experiments
Other artifacts and their effects
Correcting for multiple artifacts
Summary of meta-analysis of d values
Exercise: Meta-Analysis of d-Values
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of d Values
Alternative experimental designs
Within-subjects experimental designs
Meta-analysis and the within-subjects design
Statistical power in the two designs
Threats to internal and external validity
Bias in observed d values
Use of multiple regression in moderation analysis of d values
General Issues in Meta-Analysis
General Technical Issues in Meta-analysis
Fixed eff
Preface to 2nd Edition
Preface to 1st Edition
Acknowledgements
Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Integration Research Findings Across Studies
General problem and an example
Problems with statistical significance tests
Is statistical power the solution?
Confidence intervals
Meta-analysis
Role of meta-analysis in the behavioral and social sciences
Role of meta-analysis in theory development
Increasing use of meta-analysis
Meta-analysis in industrial-organizational psychology
Wider impact of meta-analysis on psychology
Impact of meta-analysis outside psychology
Meta-analysis and social policy
Meta-analysis and theories of data
Conclusions
Study Artifacts and Their Impact on Study Outcomes
Study Artifacts
Sampling error, statistical power, and the interpretation of research literatures
When and how to cumulate
Undercorrection for artifacts in the corrected standard deviation
Coding study characteristics and capitalization on sampling error in moderator analysis
A look ahead in the book
Meta-Analysis of Correlations
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Corrected Individually for Artifacts
Introduction and Overview
Bare bones meta-analysis: Correcting for sampling error only
Artifacts other than sampling error
Multiple simultaneous artifacts
Meta-analysis of individually corrected correlations
A worked example: Indirect range restriction
Summary of meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Exercise 1: Bare bones meta-analysis
Exercise 2: Meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Using Artifact Distributions
Full artifact distribution meta-analysis
Accuracy of corrections for artifacts
Mixed meta-analysis: Partial artifact information in individual studies
Summary of artifact distribution of meta-analysis of correlations
Exercise: Artifact distribution meta-analysis
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of Correlations
r versus : Which should be used?
r vs. regression slopes and intercepts in meta-analysis
Technical factors that cause overestimation of
Fixed and random models in meta-analysis
Credibility vs. confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Computing confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Range Restriction in meta-analysis: New technical analysis
Criticisms of meta-analysis procedures for correlations
Meta-Analysis of Experimental Effects and Other Dichotomous Comparisons
Treatment Effects: Experimental Artifacts and Their Impact
Quantification of the treatment effect: The d statistic and the point-biserial correlation
Sampling error in d values: Illustrations
Error of measurement in the dependent variable
Error of measurement in the treatment variable
Variation across studies in treatment strength
Range variation on the dependent variable
Dichotomization of the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the treatment variable
Bias in the effect size (d statistic)
Recording, computational, and transcriptional errors
Multiple artifacts and corrections
Meta-Analysis Methods for d Values
Effect size indices: d and r
An Alternative to d: Glass' d
Sampling error in the d statistic
Cumulation and correction of the variance for sampling error
Analysis of moderator variables
Correcting d values for measurement error in the dependent variable
Measurement error in the independent variable in experiments
Other artifacts and their effects
Correcting for multiple artifacts
Summary of meta-analysis of d values
Exercise: Meta-Analysis of d-Values
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of d Values
Alternative experimental designs
Within-subjects experimental designs
Meta-analysis and the within-subjects design
Statistical power in the two designs
Threats to internal and external validity
Bias in observed d values
Use of multiple regression in moderation analysis of d values
General Issues in Meta-Analysis
General Technical Issues in Meta-analysis
Fixed eff
Preface to 1st Edition
Acknowledgements
Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Integration Research Findings Across Studies
General problem and an example
Problems with statistical significance tests
Is statistical power the solution?
Confidence intervals
Meta-analysis
Role of meta-analysis in the behavioral and social sciences
Role of meta-analysis in theory development
Increasing use of meta-analysis
Meta-analysis in industrial-organizational psychology
Wider impact of meta-analysis on psychology
Impact of meta-analysis outside psychology
Meta-analysis and social policy
Meta-analysis and theories of data
Conclusions
Study Artifacts and Their Impact on Study Outcomes
Study Artifacts
Sampling error, statistical power, and the interpretation of research literatures
When and how to cumulate
Undercorrection for artifacts in the corrected standard deviation
Coding study characteristics and capitalization on sampling error in moderator analysis
A look ahead in the book
Meta-Analysis of Correlations
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Corrected Individually for Artifacts
Introduction and Overview
Bare bones meta-analysis: Correcting for sampling error only
Artifacts other than sampling error
Multiple simultaneous artifacts
Meta-analysis of individually corrected correlations
A worked example: Indirect range restriction
Summary of meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Exercise 1: Bare bones meta-analysis
Exercise 2: Meta-analysis correcting each correlation individually
Meta-Analysis of Correlations Using Artifact Distributions
Full artifact distribution meta-analysis
Accuracy of corrections for artifacts
Mixed meta-analysis: Partial artifact information in individual studies
Summary of artifact distribution of meta-analysis of correlations
Exercise: Artifact distribution meta-analysis
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of Correlations
r versus : Which should be used?
r vs. regression slopes and intercepts in meta-analysis
Technical factors that cause overestimation of
Fixed and random models in meta-analysis
Credibility vs. confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Computing confidence intervals in meta-analysis
Range Restriction in meta-analysis: New technical analysis
Criticisms of meta-analysis procedures for correlations
Meta-Analysis of Experimental Effects and Other Dichotomous Comparisons
Treatment Effects: Experimental Artifacts and Their Impact
Quantification of the treatment effect: The d statistic and the point-biserial correlation
Sampling error in d values: Illustrations
Error of measurement in the dependent variable
Error of measurement in the treatment variable
Variation across studies in treatment strength
Range variation on the dependent variable
Dichotomization of the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the dependent variable
Imperfect construct validity in the treatment variable
Bias in the effect size (d statistic)
Recording, computational, and transcriptional errors
Multiple artifacts and corrections
Meta-Analysis Methods for d Values
Effect size indices: d and r
An Alternative to d: Glass' d
Sampling error in the d statistic
Cumulation and correction of the variance for sampling error
Analysis of moderator variables
Correcting d values for measurement error in the dependent variable
Measurement error in the independent variable in experiments
Other artifacts and their effects
Correcting for multiple artifacts
Summary of meta-analysis of d values
Exercise: Meta-Analysis of d-Values
Technical Questions in Meta-Analysis of d Values
Alternative experimental designs
Within-subjects experimental designs
Meta-analysis and the within-subjects design
Statistical power in the two designs
Threats to internal and external validity
Bias in observed d values
Use of multiple regression in moderation analysis of d values
General Issues in Meta-Analysis
General Technical Issues in Meta-analysis
Fixed eff
"Clearly written and compellingly argued, this book explains the procedures and benefits of correcting for measurement error and range restriction and details the methodological developments in meta-analysis over the last decade. No one should consider conducting a meta-analysis without first reading this book. It is essential reading for all scientists." Michael A. McDaniel