Jacobi's Method is More Accurate Than QR
Versandkostenfrei!
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
15,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Weitere Ausgaben:
PAYBACK Punkte
8 °P sammeln!
This study analyzes the accuracy of Jacobi's method in comparison to the QR algorithm for matrix computations. Originally published in 1988, "Jacobi's Method is More Accurate Than QR" presents a rigorous mathematical treatment demonstrating the circumstances under which Jacobi's method offers superior precision. The research contributes valuable insights to the field of numerical analysis and is useful to researchers and practitioners dealing with eigenvalue problems and matrix diagonalization. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge ...
This study analyzes the accuracy of Jacobi's method in comparison to the QR algorithm for matrix computations. Originally published in 1988, "Jacobi's Method is More Accurate Than QR" presents a rigorous mathematical treatment demonstrating the circumstances under which Jacobi's method offers superior precision. The research contributes valuable insights to the field of numerical analysis and is useful to researchers and practitioners dealing with eigenvalue problems and matrix diagonalization. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich für
