Evaluating Experiential Leader Development
A Programmatic Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of US Air Force Squadron Officer School Curr
Versandkostenfrei!
Versandfertig in über 4 Wochen
15,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
PAYBACK Punkte
8 °P sammeln!
Leader development programs often employ experiential learning exercises. The impact of such exercises is not clear. This research investigated experiential leader development using a quasi-experimental design to analyze the differences in two consecutive US Air Force Squadron Officer School (SOS) in-residence classes. The curriculum was altered between classes by the addition of the Combat Leadership Exercise (CLX), an experiential war-gaming activity. Experiential programs regularly use mean differences between pretest and posttest measurements to represent program impact. However, research ...
Leader development programs often employ experiential learning exercises. The impact of such exercises is not clear. This research investigated experiential leader development using a quasi-experimental design to analyze the differences in two consecutive US Air Force Squadron Officer School (SOS) in-residence classes. The curriculum was altered between classes by the addition of the Combat Leadership Exercise (CLX), an experiential war-gaming activity. Experiential programs regularly use mean differences between pretest and posttest measurements to represent program impact. However, research shows that participants may change the way they evaluate themselves between test administrations due to their experiences in the programs, a phenomenon known as response shift. Response shift renders results of mean differences evaluation invalid. The common means differences showed SOS had weak impact on leader development and showed no difference between the treatment class (CLX) and the comparison class (no CLX). However, structural equation modeling identified the presence of response shift within each SOS class, indicating that students had reconceptualized or recalibrated certain aspects of leadership measured before and after SOS. The implications of response shift and its measurement are discussed. An argument for changing the leader development evaluation paradigm to legitimize response shift as a program outcome is presented. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich für
