DEVELOPMENT AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF POST-COMMUNIST PARTY SYSTEM:
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARMENIA AND KYRGYZSTAN
Versandkostenfrei!
Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen
32,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
PAYBACK Punkte
16 °P sammeln!
The paper will explore whether high level ofinstitutionalization is conditioned by the existenceof informal networks and clientelism, to compare theparty system of Armenia with the party system ofKyrgyzstan, specify the level of institutionalizationand discover the reasons of different levels, thesimilarities and differences of the system. How doparty politics operate differently in thesecountries? Why is it that countries with so manysimilarities (strong informal network, clientelistrelations) have different institutional levels ofparty system? Therefore, it is a puzzle whetherinstitutionaliz...
The paper will explore whether high level of
institutionalization is conditioned by the existence
of informal networks and clientelism, to compare the
party system of Armenia with the party system of
Kyrgyzstan, specify the level of institutionalization
and discover the reasons of different levels, the
similarities and differences of the system. How do
party politics operate differently in these
countries? Why is it that countries with so many
similarities (strong informal network, clientelist
relations) have different institutional levels of
party system? Therefore, it is a puzzle whether
institutionalization of party system matters in those
countries. If not, what is it that matters in the
party and political systems of Armenia and
Kyrgyzstan? I will also specify what factors
assisted those two countries in the
institutionalization of their party system, what
criteria should be taken into consideration for
measuring the level of party system
institutionalization.
institutionalization is conditioned by the existence
of informal networks and clientelism, to compare the
party system of Armenia with the party system of
Kyrgyzstan, specify the level of institutionalization
and discover the reasons of different levels, the
similarities and differences of the system. How do
party politics operate differently in these
countries? Why is it that countries with so many
similarities (strong informal network, clientelist
relations) have different institutional levels of
party system? Therefore, it is a puzzle whether
institutionalization of party system matters in those
countries. If not, what is it that matters in the
party and political systems of Armenia and
Kyrgyzstan? I will also specify what factors
assisted those two countries in the
institutionalization of their party system, what
criteria should be taken into consideration for
measuring the level of party system
institutionalization.
Andere Kunden interessierten sich für
