
Developing a More Flexible Operational Test and Evaluation Process for Information Technology Author
PAYBACK Punkte
7 °P sammeln!
The US military currently possesses an asymetric advantage in most weapons systems. One area in particular is the cyber domain; however, the US is losing its advantage in this domain by relying on the same acquisition and testing process for information systems as it uses for hardware-centric systems. This paper reviews the current acquisition and operational testing process for information technology and offers a more flexible, responsive, risk-based approach for testing software-centric acquisition programs. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part o...
The US military currently possesses an asymetric advantage in most weapons systems. One area in particular is the cyber domain; however, the US is losing its advantage in this domain by relying on the same acquisition and testing process for information systems as it uses for hardware-centric systems. This paper reviews the current acquisition and operational testing process for information technology and offers a more flexible, responsive, risk-based approach for testing software-centric acquisition programs. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.