Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Decision Analysis: Filling the Doctrinal Void in Applying the Effects-Based Approach to Operations]( "Decision Analysis: Filling the Doctrinal Void in Applying the Effects-Based Approach to Operations")
Decision Analysis: Filling the Doctrinal Void in Applying the Effects-Based Approach to Operations59,99 €![Decision Analysis: Surviving First Contact]( "Decision Analysis: Surviving First Contact")
Decision Analysis: Surviving First Contact59,99 €![Risk Mitigation and Critical Factors Affecting CSAR]( "Risk Mitigation and Critical Factors Affecting CSAR")
Risk Mitigation and Critical Factors Affecting CSAR59,99 €![An Empirical Investigation of Critical Factors Affecting the Ability of Public Entities to Compete in Public Private Competitions]( "An Empirical Investigation of Critical Factors Affecting the Ability of Public Entities to Compete in Public Private Competitions")
An Empirical Investigation of Critical Factors Affecting the Ability of Public Entities to Compete in Public Private Competitions59,99 €![Decision Analysis with Value-Focused Thinking as a Methodology in Structuring the Civil Engineer Operations Flight]( "Decision Analysis with Value-Focused Thinking as a Methodology in Structuring the Civil Engineer Operations Flight")
Decision Analysis with Value-Focused Thinking as a Methodology in Structuring the Civil Engineer Operations Flight59,99 €![Small Business Programs: Benefits, Barriers, Bridges and Critical Success Factors]( "Small Business Programs: Benefits, Barriers, Bridges and Critical Success Factors")
Small Business Programs: Benefits, Barriers, Bridges and Critical Success Factors59,99 €![Decision Analysis with Value Focused Thinking as a Methodology to Select Force Protection Initiatives for Evaluation]( "Decision Analysis with Value Focused Thinking as a Methodology to Select Force Protection Initiatives for Evaluation")
Decision Analysis with Value Focused Thinking as a Methodology to Select Force Protection Initiatives for Evaluation59,99 €
For planners and leaders to formulate plans in dealing with adversaries, at least a basic understanding of their decision-loop is necessary. This paper seeks to answer two basic questions in furthering the debate over decision-making analysis. The question is whether the time and effort required for such analysis leads to any tangible benefit and if it does, then what model might lead planners to a viable understanding of an adversary. Mirror-imaging, stereotyping, and other errors commonly lead to false assumptions leading to equally faulty solutions. Increased emphasis on decision cycles during mission analysis is necessary in order to reduce as much as possible the fog of war. This paper recommends a construct based on Dr. Strange's critical factors analysis for conducting a decision cycle analysis. This paper is an attempt to begin discussion on models useful to planners with relatively little international-relations experience who are still required to make such decisions.