Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![How to Be a Marxist in Philosophy]( "How to Be a Marxist in Philosophy")
How to Be a Marxist in Philosophy31,99 €![The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition]( "The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition")
The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition146,99 €![Erste Philosophie (1923/24) Zweiter Teil Theorie Der Phänomenologischen Reduktion]( "Erste Philosophie (1923/24) Zweiter Teil Theorie Der Phänomenologischen Reduktion")
Erste Philosophie (1923/24) Zweiter Teil Theorie Der Phänomenologischen Reduktion408,99 €![Apostles of Sartre: Existentialism in America, 1945-1963]( "Apostles of Sartre: Existentialism in America, 1945-1963")
Apostles of Sartre: Existentialism in America, 1945-196327,99 €![The Limits of Logical Empiricism]( "The Limits of Logical Empiricism")
The Limits of Logical Empiricism232,99 €![Cambridge and Vienna]( "Cambridge and Vienna")
Cambridge and Vienna119,99 €![Roderick M. Chisholm]( "Roderick M. Chisholm")
Roderick M. Chisholm183,99 €
This book recounts the history of Marxist philosophy in China between 1923 and 1945 through the writings and activities of four philosophers: Qu Qiubai, Ai Siqi, Li Da and Mao Zedong. Two of these philosophers - Qu and Mao - were also political activists and leaders, but their contribution to this history is as important, if not more so, than the contribution of Ai and Li who were predominantly philosophers and scholars. The inclusion of Qu and Mao underlines the intimate connection between philosophy and politics in the revolutionary movement in China. It is not possible to speak credibly of Marxist philosophy in China without considering the political context within which its introduction, elaboration and dissemination proceeded. Indeed, each of the philosophers considered in this book repudiated the notion that the study of philosophy was a scholastic intellectual exercise devoid of political significance. Each of these philosophers regarded himself as a revolutionary, and considered philosophy to be useful precisely because it could facilitate a comprehension of the world and so accelerate efforts to change it. By the same token, each of these philosophers took philosophy seriously; each bent his mind to the daunting task of mastering the arcane and labyrinthian philosophical system of dialectical materialism. Philosophy might well be political, they believed, but this was no excuse for philosophical dilettantism.