Warren Samuels

The Legal-Economic Nexus (eBook, ePUB)

Fundamental Processes

• Format: ePub

Produktbeschreibung

Providing another key contribution to the immensely popular field of law and economics, this book, written by the doyen of the history of economic thought in the US, explores the dynamic relationship between economics, law and polity.Combining a selection of old and new essays by Warren J. Samuels that chart a number of key themes, it provides an i

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• Seitenzahl: 512
• Erscheinungstermin: 22. Februar 2007
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781135982188
• Artikelnr.: 42725645

Autorenporträt

Warren Samuels

Inhaltsangabe

Part 1: Rights, Markets and Power: The Legal-Economic Nexus 1.
Introduction: Belief and Power 2. The Legal-Economic Nexus 3. The Nature
and Sources of Rights 4. Markets and their Social Construction Part 2: The
Problem of Order 5. Joseph J. Spengler's Concept of the 'Problem of Order':
A Reconsideration and Extension 6. The Status of the Status Quo: The
Buchanan Colloquium 7. The Problem of the Status of the Status Quo: Some
Comments 8.Two Views of Government: A Conversation Part 3: Language, Social
Choice and Order 9. Some Problems in the Use of Language in Economics 10.
Poletown and Hathcock : An Essay on Some Problems in the Language of the
Law 11. An Evolutionary Approach to Law and Economics 12. The Rule of Law
and the Capture and Use of Government in a World of Inequality Part 4: Land
and Governance: The Transformation of Order 13.The Duke of Argyll and Edwin
L. Godkin as Precursors to Hayek on the Relation of Ignorance to Policy,
Parts I-IV 14.The Duke of Argyll and Henry George: Land Ownership and
Governance Part 5: The Subtleties of Policy Making 15. The Pervasitve
Proposition, 'What is, is and Ought to Be': A Critique 16. What is, is
What? 17. Professional Policy Advocacy or Policy Diffidence?