Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice (eBook, PDF)
A Comparative Perspective
Redaktion: Barsotti, Vittoria; Simoncini, Andrea; Cartabia, Marta; Carozza, Paolo
38,95 €
38,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
19 °P sammeln
38,95 €
Als Download kaufen
38,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
19 °P sammeln
Jetzt verschenken
Alle Infos zum eBook verschenken
38,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
Alle Infos zum eBook verschenken
19 °P sammeln
Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice (eBook, PDF)
A Comparative Perspective
Redaktion: Barsotti, Vittoria; Simoncini, Andrea; Cartabia, Marta; Carozza, Paolo
- Format: PDF
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Bitte loggen Sie sich zunächst in Ihr Kundenkonto ein oder registrieren Sie sich bei
bücher.de, um das eBook-Abo tolino select nutzen zu können.
Hier können Sie sich einloggen
Hier können Sie sich einloggen
Sie sind bereits eingeloggt. Klicken Sie auf 2. tolino select Abo, um fortzufahren.
Bitte loggen Sie sich zunächst in Ihr Kundenkonto ein oder registrieren Sie sich bei bücher.de, um das eBook-Abo tolino select nutzen zu können.
This collection adopts a distinctive method and structure to introduce the work of Italian constitutional law scholars into the Anglophone dialogue while also bringing a number of prominent non-Italian constitutional law scholars to study and write about constitutional justice in a global context.
- Geräte: PC
- ohne Kopierschutz
- eBook Hilfe
- Größe: 5.45MB
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- Rule of Law, Common Values, and Illiberal Constitutionalism (eBook, PDF)40,95 €
- David KosarDomestic Judicial Treatment of European Court of Human Rights Case Law (eBook, PDF)40,95 €
- Dialogues on Italian Constitutional Justice (eBook, ePUB)38,95 €
- Azin TadjdiniConstitutional Law, Religion and Equal Liberty (eBook, PDF)33,95 €
- The Law and Legitimacy of Imposed Constitutions (eBook, PDF)34,95 €
- Viera PejchalHate Speech and Human Rights in Eastern Europe (eBook, PDF)33,95 €
- Kristin KamøyDiversity of Law in the United Arab Emirates (eBook, PDF)40,95 €
-
-
-
This collection adopts a distinctive method and structure to introduce the work of Italian constitutional law scholars into the Anglophone dialogue while also bringing a number of prominent non-Italian constitutional law scholars to study and write about constitutional justice in a global context.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 26. April 2021
- Englisch
- ISBN-13: 9781000217315
- Artikelnr.: 61126531
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 304
- Erscheinungstermin: 26. April 2021
- Englisch
- ISBN-13: 9781000217315
- Artikelnr.: 61126531
Vittoria Barsotti, Professor of Comparative Law, University of Florence, Italy; Paolo G. Carozza, Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame Law School, USA; Marta Cartabia, Vice President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Italy; Andrea Simoncini, Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Florence, Italy;
Introduction; 2. Dialogue as Method, Vittoria Barsotti, Paolo G. Carozza,
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;
Introduction; 2. Dialogue as Method, Vittoria Barsotti, Paolo G. Carozza,
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;
Marta Cartabia, and Andrea Simoncini; Dialogue I: Constitutional courts and
legal scholarship; 3. Je t'aime... moi non plus: some considerations on
(and impressions of) the relationships between constitutional justice and
legal scholarship, Paolo Passaglia; 4. The wasp and the orchid:
constitutional justice and legal scholarship need each other, Marc
Verdussen; Dialogue II: Open and closed forms of constitutional
adjudication; 5. Openness and transparency in constitutional adjudication:
amici curiae, third-party intervention, and fact-finding powers, Tania
Groppi and Anna Maria Lecis Cocco Ortu; 6. Procedural rules and the
cultivation of well-informed and responsive constitutional judiciaries,
Maartje De Visser; Dialogue III: The principle of collegiality; 7.
Collegiality over personality: the refusal of separate opinions in Italy,
Diletta Tega; 8. `Collegiality' in comparative context, Sarah Harding;
Dialogue IV: Access to constitutional adjudication; 9. Direct
constitutional complaint and Italian style do not match. But why?
Elisabetta Lamarque; 10. The potential virtues and risks of abstract
constitutional challenges and individual complaints: some reflections from
Spain, Victor Ferreres Comella; Dialogue V: Judicial reasoning and
interpretation; 11. Forms and methods of constitutional interpretation -
Italian style, Giorgio Pino; 12. The relationship between forms and methods
in constitutional interpretation: comparative reflections, Jeff Pojanowski;
Dialogue VI: National constitutional adjudication in a transnational
context ; 13. The Italian constitutional court in the European space - an
empirical approach, Marta Infantino; 14. European relationality in the
European legal space: country-specific mixtures within one European style,
Patricia Popelier; 15. Power is perfected in weakness: on the authority of
the Italian constitutional court, Armin von Bogdandy and Davide Paris;